Lead
The Royal Commission on Antisemitism and Social Cohesion has expressed frustration at X Corp's refusal to engage with its inquiry, with counsel assisting the commission delivering a scathing address to platforms that did not respond. The commission has been hearing evidence about the prevalence of antisemitic content on social media, and representatives from Meta, TikTok, and YouTube Australia have fronted the inquiry.
Counsel assisting Richard Lancaster SC said on Friday that X Corp was contacted repeatedly through its Australian legal representatives in May and June but remained silent. He described the company's conduct as showing a 'shocking disrespect and disregard' for the online safety of Australian social media users. The lack of participation by X, Telegram, and others, he said, demonstrated an urgent need for regulatory reform.
Coverage comparison
The Online Hate Prevention Institute (OHPI), a charity that monitors and reports antisemitic content, has told the commission that Elon Musk is partly to blame for anti-Jewish hatred on the platform. Dr. Andre Oboler, who leads the institute, testified that X Corp has been 'generally difficult to work with, particularly from Australia' and that his organization has not had contact with the company for years. He said that the last Australian-based staff member he was able to engage with was former eSafety commissioner Julie Inman Grant, and that since then engagement has been limited.
Dr. Oboler linked the change in collaboration to Mr. Musk's 2022 purchase of the platform, which led to about 80 per cent of the trust and safety staff being fired almost immediately. He described a philosophical shift from a platform that 'was at least trying to improve safety' to one that embraced 'absolute free speech' almost, and noted that many users who had previously been removed were invited back, creating a toxic environment.
Key claims
- X Corp did not cooperate with the Royal Commission, remaining silent despite repeated contact through its Australian legal representatives in May and June.
- Representatives from Meta, TikTok, and YouTube Australia did front the commission.
- Counsel assisting Richard Lancaster described X's conduct as showing 'shocking disrespect and disregard' for online safety.
- The Online Hate Prevention Institute's Dr. Andre Oboler testified that X has been difficult to work with, with no contact for years.
- Approximately 80% of trust and safety staff were fired after Musk's 2022 purchase of the platform.
- The platform's philosophy shifted from safety improvement to 'absolute free speech' after Musk's purchase.
- Previously removed users were invited back to the platform after Musk's purchase, creating a toxic environment.
- Elon Musk amplified antisemitic content and performed a controversial salute at Trump's January 2025 inauguration, responding to criticism with 'The everyone is Hitler attack is sooo tired'.
- X Corp no longer has a dedicated media contact and sends automated poo emoji replies to emails.
Perspectives
Royal Commission (via Counsel Assisting) : The commission views non-cooperation by X and Telegram as a clear disregard for Australian online safety, with the lack of participation demonstrating an urgent need for regulatory reform.
Online Hate Prevention Institute Dr. Oboler attributes the rise in antisemitic content to Musk's leadership, citing mass layoffs of trust and safety staff and a philosophical shift toward 'absolute free speech' as key factors.
X Corp (Elon Musk) While X did not engage with the commission, Musk's public statements suggest a defensive posture, as seen in his response to criticism of the 'salute': 'The everyone is Hitler attack is sooo tired.'