Lead
Woodside Energy has told a Senate inquiry that a proposed 25% tax on all gas exports would make projects economically unviable, as the Greens ramp up pressure on the Australian government to overhaul gas taxation ahead of the federal budget. The inquiry, chaired by Greens Senator Steph Hodgins-May, is examining the country's gas export tax settings, with executives from major gas companies called to give evidence.
Coverage Comparison
Reports from ABC Australia and The Guardian provide overlapping but distinct coverage of the ongoing Senate inquiry and the broader tax debate. ABC's coverage focuses on the inquiry hearings, including Woodside's CFO Graham Tiver's appearance in Perth, while The Guardian emphasizes the political pressure on the Labor government to adopt a 25% export tax. A separate ABC story details the environmental approval for Chevron's Gorgon expansion, linking it to the tax debate.
Key Claims
The Greens are advocating for a flat 25% tax on all gas exports, a proposal that has gained traction amid rising energy prices. Labor is facing growing calls from unions, social service groups, and crossbenchers to impose the tax, which could add up to $17 billion to the budget, according to supporters cited by The Guardian.
Woodside's CFO Graham Tiver told the inquiry that adding a 25% tax on top of existing taxes such as the Petroleum Resource Rent Tax (PRRT) and corporate income tax would be unsustainable. "If you were putting that on top of PRRT, if you were putting it on top of corporate income tax, I'm not sure how any project would survive," he said, as reported by ABC.
When Senator Hodgins-May asked if Woodside's business model was "so weak that it only works with both global gas prices being high and being given free gas from Australians," Tiver called that "factually incorrect," noting that the Australian business delivered $US3 billion in earnings before interest and taxes last year despite low-to-medium prices. He said Woodside paid about 44 cents per dollar in tax.
Chevron's general manager Kynan Scarr confirmed the company pays around $1.8 billion annually to operate and maintain its facilities, responding to questioning from Independent Senator David Pocock about the gas Chevron uses for its operations.
Perspectives
Industry Perspective
Industry representatives argue that additional taxes would deter investment and reduce production. Chevron Australia president Balaji Krishnamurthy said, "Short-term measures to boost the tax take from gas companies can look attractive on paper, but they carry longer-term consequences in the form of reduced investment and lower production." Australian Energy Producers CEO Samantha McCulloch noted the industry contributed $21.9 billion in taxes and royalties last year.
Political/Green Perspective
The Greens and crossbench senators argue that gas companies are not paying their fair share. Senator Hodgins-May said the Gorgon project alone represents "the government essentially handing $300 billion worth of Australian gas to an American owned multinational… ripping up our oceans and paying absolutely nothing in royalties." The committee has requested testimony from CEOs of Woodside, Chevron, Santos, Shell, Inpex, and ConocoPhillips.
Regulatory/Environmental Perspective
Chevron's Gorgon project, Australia's largest, received environmental approval from the offshore petroleum regulator NOPSEMA for expansion, which will maintain production of about 15.6 million tonnes of LNG per year. The approval has reignited debate over gas taxation, with critics pointing out that Chevron does not pay state royalties for gas from the project.