Tertius News is an AI-native newsroom: an AI model reads the source articles linked below — on this story, all of them from one outlet — and extracts what that outlet reported, claim by claim. How this works →
US-Iran Negotiations: Reports Claim Washington Offered Tehran New Plan via Mediators
Iranian Ambassador to Moscow Kazem Jalali stated that the US proposed via mediators that Iran develop a new negotiation plan after Tehran rejected an American 15-point proposal. Iranian officials say they have prepared responses to Washington's proposals, while a US official characterized Iran's revised plan as a workable basis for talks.
Recent reports detail a contentious negotiation process between the United States and Iran, with both sides presenting and rejecting proposals through intermediaries. According to statements from Iranian officials and a US official, the exchange has seen a 15-point US plan rejected by Tehran and a subsequent revised proposal from Iran now considered a basis for further talks.
Coverage Comparison
Coverage from TASS, the Russian state news agency, presents a narrative centered on the diplomatic back-and-forth. A report from the Iranian Ambassador to Moscow, Kazem Jalali, published by TASS, describes a sequence where the initial US plan was rejected and the US then proposed, through mediators, that Iran draft a new one. This is attributed to an interview with Vedomosti.
Key Claims
Iran's rejection of the US plan: Iranian Ambassador to Moscow Kazem Jalali told Vedomosti that “we rejected their 15-point plan immediately” and that Tehran was not interested in negotiating “from a position of strength and threats.”
US proposal for a new plan: According to Ambassador Jalali, the US proposed through mediators that Iran develop a new negotiation plan after its own was rejected. He claimed the US agreed to this 10-point plan as a basis for negotiations.
Iran's prepared responses: Iranian Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Esmaeil Baghaei said, per IRNA, that proposals from mediators, including the US’s 15-point plan, were deemed “excessive, unusual and illogical,” but that Iran had prepared its own responses and was prepared to state “what they entail” when necessary.
US characterization of Iran's plan: White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt described Iran's initial 10-point plan as “fundamentally unserious, unacceptable and completely discarded.” However, she noted that after continued pressure, Iran submitted a revised plan that the Trump administration determined was a “workable basis on which to negotiate,” according to the TASS report.
Perspectives
Reports from TASS, which cites statements from both Iranian officials and a US official, indicate that direct talks in Islamabad at the end of February failed to produce a long-term settlement, with both sides citing “a number of contradictions.” The US began a naval blockade of Iran on April 13, according to the Russian news agency, and a two-week ceasefire was announced on April 7.
How this outlet told it
TASS — English
Framing: Iran's response to US proposals — Neutral
Facts Included:
Iran prepared responses to Washington's proposals
Iranian Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Esmaeil Baghaei commented on the proposals
The US presented a 15-point plan
Iran deemed the proposals excessive, unusual, and illogical
AI-extracted; can misattribute a claim — see Methodology.
Each row is one claim, attributed to the outlet whose wording states it most clearly. Confidence rates how directly the source text states the claim — explicit and unhedged rates high; hedged, pieced-together, or internally inconsistent statements rate lower. It does not measure whether the claim is true. Status counts the distinct outlets we found asserting it — so a single-source claim can still show high confidence, and a multi-source claim can show medium. Every one of those outlets is named beside the status, so you can check the count against the list. For claims extracted before we began storing that list, the row says so: it names the outlet the claim is quoted from and states that we have not recorded which outlets backed it. Outlets wrote at different times, so a figure that evolves — a casualty count, for example — can legitimately differ between rows; check the "as of" time next to each claim's source.
Claim
Confidence
Status
ClaimThe US presented a 15-point plan to Iran, which Iran deemed excessive, unusual, and illogical.