US envoy criticises Israeli strike

Washington's ambassador to Turkey and special envoy to Syria, Tom Barrack, on Tuesday condemned Israel's attack on the disused Abu al-Duhur air base in northern Syria as an "unnecessary escalation that does not advance regional stability". The strike, which followed weeks of Israeli operations in Syria, prompted an unusually public rebuke from Barrack, who was speaking after Israel had accused Turkey of seeking to use the base.

Barrack's remarks, made in an interview with influencer Mario Nawfal, went further, suggesting the attack may have been intended to "bait the Turks" and escalate tensions. He later said Israel did not warn the US before the strike, detailing how the attack took Washington by surprise.

Israel's Defence Minister, Israel Katz, hit back on Saturday, calling Barrack's comments "full of inaccuracies" and saying that Israel had shared intelligence with Washington prior to the strike. Jerusalem also faulted Barrack for describing the Golan Heights as "occupied", citing the 2019 US proclamation maintaining Israeli sovereignty.

Israel and Turkey at odds over Abu al-Duhur

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu defended the Tuesday strike, alleging Turkey had been preparing to establish a military presence at the air base. Ankara has denied any visit, and Turkish officials blasted the strikes as "reckless". Two Syrian officials, however, told the Los Angeles Times that a Turkish delegation had visited the base a day before the attack. Barrack, meanwhile, reported that US checks into Israeli intelligence found Turkey's military build-up was "not happening".

Barrack's account, given in a detailed interview, also raised the possibility of a breakdown in communication; he said a field commander might have acted on his own and without telling the US or Turkey. He further recalled the 2015 Turkish downing of a Russian jet to illustrate how close Israel and Turkey came to direct confrontation.

For Israel, the danger is not merely rhetorical. A Turkish military presence in Syria could redraw the regional balance, and Jerusalem has voiced concerns about Ankara's influence and its alliance with the new authorities in Damascus. Turkey and Syria signed a military cooperation agreement last year, and Damascus's interim President Ahmed al-Sharaa has publicly stated he does not seek war with Israel.

Barrack under fire at home

The diplomatic clash has intensified politically in Washington and Jerusalem. Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Sa'ar joined Katz in rejecting Barrack's assertions, saying they contradict the position of President Donald Trump. Conservative activist Laura Loomer accused Barrack of siding with the 'bad guys' and claimed Turkey was planning to deploy advanced Russian air defence systems; a source told the Post confirmed that Turkey is seeking radar, and then air defence systems, in Syria.

Turkey has also been pursuing legal measures against the Israeli leader. Ankara announced it was seeking an Interpol red notice against Netanyahu, accusing him of genocide in connection with the interception of a Gaza-bound aid flotilla, in a move that further heated the atmosphere. Netanyahu's office called the Turkish president an antisemitic dictator; Erdogan's office condemned the remarks as "outrageous ravings".

Background: Israel's post-Assad posture

Israel has conducted hundreds of strikes in Syria since the December 2024 fall of Bashar al-Assad and has moved troops into a UN-patrolled buffer zone in the Golan Heights. The new Syrian government of al-Sharaa, a former rebel leader, has reproached restraint, and the Syrian foreign ministry condemned the strike as an "unjustified act of aggression" and a violation of sovereignty. US policy, however, remains mixed: Washington has lifted sanctions and invited al-Sharaa to the White House, while Trump has praised Israel as a "great ally" and taken no firm action to pressure the Israeli military operations.

Perspectives

  • Israel: The government sees Turkey's potential military and growing presence in Syria as a direct security threat, arguing that the strike was necessary to prevent a breach of agreements and to block Turkish or Russian radar and air defences that could limit Israeli Air Force freedom of action.
  • United States (Envoy Barrack): The US special envoy sees the new Syrian government as non-threatening and concerned that Israeli strikes risk unnecessary escalation while serving domestic politics, urging diplomatic solutions.
  • Turkey: Ankara has denied trying to set up a military base at Abu al-Duhur, denounced the strikes as reckless, and has escalated its own rhetoric against the Israeli leadership.
  • Syria: The Syrian government condemns the repeated Israeli attacks as violations of sovereignty, stating it has shown restraint and is seeking stability under the new al-Sharaa government.