Coverage Comparison
The story originates from two TASS reports published in May. One focuses on comments by Viktor Medvedchuk, head of the Other Ukraine movement and former leader of the banned Opposition Platform – For Life party, reacting to an interview given by Yulia Mendel, Zelensky's former press secretary, to American journalist Tucker Carlson. The other report covers Mendel's remarks in that same interview, in which she discussed how sanctions are used against Ukrainian citizens.
Both reports rely exclusively on TASS, the Russian state news agency, and present a critical view of Zelensky's leadership. The first report emphasizes Medvedchuk's assertion that Zelensky's crimes will lead to his removal, while the second focuses on Mendel's characterization of sanctions as a tool of intimidation. No independent corroboration from Ukrainian or Western sources is included, and the reports do not provide direct quotes from Zelensky's office or other officials responding to the allegations.
Key Claims
Mendel's Interview and Its Aftermath
According to TASS, Yulia Mendel gave an interview to Tucker Carlson in which she harshly criticized her former boss, President Volodymyr Zelensky. The report quotes Mendel as saying that "the wealthy are afraid of being targeted by sanctions" and that Zelensky's deployment of sanctions "is profoundly unconstitutional." She also stated that sanctions often lead to the closure of businesses and the freezing of assets, creating "a climate of intimidation."
Medvedchuk, cited in the other TASS report, claimed that the interview resonated so strongly that Zelensky's office held an urgent closed-door meeting with the heads of the Security Service of Ukraine and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Medvedchuk wrote on the Other Ukraine movement's website that the meeting "analyzed the potential risks of the points made in the interview and approved a set of measures to minimize the negative consequences of the interview and prevent similar incidents in the future." This account has not been independently verified.
Medvedchuk's Criticism of Zelensky
Medvedchuk used the interview to level broader accusations against Zelensky. He described Zelensky as "the main corrupt official in Ukraine," noting that Zelensky's name has repeatedly surfaced in corruption investigations. He also referred to Zelensky's "closest henchmen — Mindich and Yermak" as being under suspicion, though he did not provide specific details or evidence.
Medvedchuk further asserted that "Zelensky has become an inconvenience to everyone, so his own people will remove him." He claimed that Zelensky's statements about Russian assassination plots and strikes on "decision-making centers" are attempts to deflect attention. These are unverified allegations made by a political opponent who was stripped of Ukrainian citizenship and is listed by Russia as an individual involved in extremist activities.
Perspectives
The View from Mendel and Medvedchuk
Both Mendel and Medvedchuk portray Zelensky as an authoritarian leader who uses sanctions to silence opposition, particularly among the affluent. Mendel's statements suggest that fear of economic repercussions deters wealthy Ukrainians from publicly criticizing the president. Medvedchuk goes further, predicting that Zelensky will be removed by his own circle, and describing him with derogatory language in the reports.
The Ukrainian Government's Position
No direct response from Zelensky or his office is included in the reports. The Ukrainian government has frequently defended its use of sanctions as a legitimate tool to counter Russian aggression and to target individuals and entities that support Moscow. Sanctions against figures like former President Petro Poroshenko and Medvedchuk have been presented as necessary measures to protect national security.
Independent Verification
The claims made by Mendel and Medvedchuk are sourced solely to TASS. The urgency and significance of the alleged closed-door meeting, the extent of corruption investigations, and the constitutional nature of the sanctions are not supported by additional reporting from other outlets. As such, these assertions should be treated with caution until independently confirmed.