Lead
Four Ugandan farmers have filed a case at the UK's High Court against the East African Crude Oil Pipeline (EACOP), seeking to have Ugandan constitutional, environmental, and climate law applied to EACOP Ltd, the UK-registered company financing the project. The claim was filed on Tuesday, before the pipeline begins operating, and asks the court to enforce Uganda's legal protections against a company incorporated in England and Wales.
Coverage comparison
The case has been reported by AllAfrica and RFI — English, both of which highlight the environmental and climate concerns raised by the claimants. Both outlets emphasize the potential impact of the project on local communities and ecosystems, and note TotalEnergies' position that strict measures have been taken to mitigate the project's environmental impact.
Key claims
The pipeline, a $5.6 billion project led by French energy giant TotalEnergies, which holds the majority stake, would become the world's longest heated pipeline upon its expected operation in 2027. Running 1,443 kilometers (897 miles) from Uganda's oilfields near Lake Albert to the Tanzanian coastal port of Tanga, the project would affect more than 100,000 people through land acquisition, according to the claimants. They also argue that it crosses critical freshwater systems and protected habitats.
Rights NGO Avaaz, which is supporting the case, has called it "first-of-its-kind" litigation. The NGO said it believes this is the first time Ugandan environmental law has been brought before a foreign court, describing EACOP as a "global test case for whether new fossil fuel megaprojects can still be forced through despite mounting legal, financial, climate and community opposition."
Avaaz stated that the case seeks remedies that could go to the heart of the project's commercial viability, including an injunction to stop oil being transported through the pipeline. The claim was filed before the pipeline starts operating.
The case follows previous legal challenges to EACOP in France, where a Paris court ruled last week that TotalEnergies was liable for emissions generated by its clients, a decision hailed as a landmark for climate law.
TotalEnergies maintains that strict measures have been taken to avoid, mitigate, and offset the project's environmental impact.