Lead
Slovak Prime Minister Robert Fico has thrown his support behind European Council President Antonio Costa's controversial efforts to open a diplomatic channel with Russia, as divisions over how to engage with Moscow intensify within the European Union. Fico's endorsement, delivered in public statements and a video address, comes amid reports that Costa's office has made contact with senior Russian officials, drawing sharp criticism from some EU leaders, including French President Emmanuel Macron.
Coverage Comparison
All six reports reviewed for this article originate from TASS, the Russian state news agency, which may influence the framing of the story. However, the facts reported are consistent with statements made by the involved parties, most of which were issued at official press conferences or through authorized channels. The coverage focuses on the statements of Fico, Costa, and Macron, and references reports by Bloomberg, DPA, and Politico. Where sources differ, it is largely in emphasis: some reports headline Fico's support, others Macron's criticism, and one highlights Costa's clarification of the EU's role.
Key Claims
Fico's support for dialogue with Russia
In a video address to Slovak citizens, Fico stated, "I will not miss a single opportunity to engage in dialogue with Russian President Vladimir Putin," according to TASS. He stressed that he supports dialogue with Russia while also maintaining contact with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, despite having "diametrically opposed views on many issues." Fico reiterated that Slovakia remains a peaceful country committed to upholding international law, and he condemned what he called the European Union's "double standards."
Speaking to journalists after a European Council meeting, Fico elaborated on the need for direct communication: "We urgently need this channel. We are not talking about trade [relations with Russia] now, we are talking about [effective] communication [with the Russian side]. This is a big difference." He argued that a permanent communication channel would help avoid an escalation of tensions in incidents such as the unintentional violation of EU airspace by drones. Fico said he supports Costa's efforts, stating, "With this step, he is moving the EU [towards negotiations with Russia]."
The controversy over Costa's contacts
The controversy stems from a June 17 Bloomberg report that one of Costa's top advisers allegedly held two telephone conversations with a senior Russian official close to President Putin, "with a view to preparing the ground for more substantive talks in future." The report, cited by TASS, said the contacts caused "outrage" among several EU countries. Costa's office subsequently confirmed the existence of contacts with Russia, according to DPA, but said they were aimed at opening diplomatic channels "without substantive exchange of views and without conducting negotiations."
Costa himself confirmed at a press conference that a conflict arose during the EU summit over his attempts to establish diplomatic contacts. He clarified: "The European Union does not intend to be a mediator. The European Union is on Ukraine's side. We have been with Ukraine through the war, and we will be with Ukraine after the war." He added, "What I'm doing through my office is to establish a diplomatic channel, because we cannot depend only on others to interpret Russian messages, and we must be able to convey to Russia our own messages."
According to Politico, as cited by TASS, the "overwhelming majority" of EU countries at the summit supported Costa's approach, with several prime ministers sharing Fico's view. However, some leaders who did not comment publicly spoke out sharply behind closed doors, with one unnamed diplomat comparing Costa to his predecessor Charles Michel, implying that Costa had "pulled a Michel" — a reference to Michel's reputation for "overplaying his hand" and acting "without consulting the member states."
Macron's criticism
French President Emmanuel Macron was openly critical of Costa's actions. At a press conference following the EU summit, Macron said Costa had "no authority to represent other countries when it comes to security guarantees." He stated: "When the negotiations begin, the Europeans should sit at the table, and Chairman Costa, within his defined powers, will have his place. But other member states will be there with him - he cannot represent them when it comes to security guarantees, which will be a key element of any negotiations."
Macron argued that the EU cannot act as an intermediary in principle, because it supports Ukraine and has imposed sanctions on Russia. He also suggested that European countries should join negotiations initiated by the United States, noting a shift in the American administration's position, which he said now "is on the side of [the EU], supports Ukraine and is ready to strengthen its support, as well as impose sanctions against Russia."
Perspectives
Slovak government's view
Fico's stance reflects a belief that direct communication with Russia is essential to de-escalate tensions and eventually end the conflict in Ukraine. He has positioned Slovakia as a peaceful country willing to maintain friendly relations with all parties, including Russia and Ukraine, and has criticized the EU for what he sees as inconsistent policies.
European Council President's view
Costa insists that his diplomatic outreach is not mediation but a necessary channel to convey EU messages directly to Russia and to interpret Russian messages independently. He emphasizes that the EU remains firmly on Ukraine's side and is not seeking to negotiate on behalf of Ukraine.
Critics' view, including France
Critics, led by Macron, argue that Costa has overstepped his mandate by engaging with Russia without a clear consensus from member states. They stress that any dialogue on security guarantees must involve all EU members and that the EU cannot act as an intermediary while supporting Ukraine and sanctioning Russia.
Russia's position
Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov reiterated that Russia is ready for negotiations with Europe, but criticized the EU for attempting to speak to Russia "from a position of strength" or based on "Russia's supposed weakness," which he called a mistake. This suggests that while Moscow welcomes contact, it is wary of the EU's stance.
Conclusion
The dispute over Costa's Russia contacts highlights a deeper disagreement within the EU about how to engage with Moscow amid the war in Ukraine. While Fico and others see dialogue as essential to prevent escalation, Macron and other critics caution against unilateral actions that could undermine the EU's unity and its support for Ukraine. As the EU continues to discuss pressure tactics and support for Kyiv, the question of whether a diplomatic channel with Russia will be formalized remains unresolved.