Lead
Federal prosecutors unsealed an indictment Wednesday against eight pro-Palestinian activists accused of conspiring to run a criminal intimidation campaign against University of Michigan officials and others, according to The Guardian and the Jerusalem Post. The indictment, announced by the Michigan Eastern District US Attorney’s Office, alleges a two-and-a-half-year campaign of vandalism and threats aimed at forcing the university to cut financial ties to Israel.
The defendants, all associated with the University of Michigan, face a maximum penalty of five years’ imprisonment for conspiracy to transmit threats, reported both outlets. Six of the eight were expected to appear in federal court in Detroit on Wednesday; one was arrested in Wisconsin, and another was not in custody, according to Gina Balaya of the US attorney’s office, as cited by The Guardian.
Coverage comparison
The Guardian and the Jerusalem Post both reported the core facts of the indictment, but their framing differed. The Guardian emphasized the legal context and the university’s investment policies, noting that the University of Michigan has insisted it has no direct investments in companies with ties to Israel and that its endowment has less than $15 million placed with funds that might include such companies. The Jerusalem Post focused more on the specifics of the alleged campaign, including the activists’ purported discussions of methods of harm and the targeting of individuals.
Both outlets quoted the US attorney’s statement. The Guardian carried the full quote from Jerome Gorgon Jr., the US attorney, who said: “In America, we rule by law not by fear. These alleged threats and attempts to terrorize government officials, businesses, and the Jewish Federation are anti-American. We will counter intimidation with justice.” The Jerusalem Post did not include this quote in the provided excerpts.
Key claims
The indictment describes incidents that previously made headlines, including the placement of fake bloody corpses on an elected university board member’s lawn and the spray-painting of anti-Israel messages at the home of the university’s president at the time, Santa Ono, according to The Guardian.
The indictment states that the activists “marked their victims with threatening symbols used by Hamas, including red inverted triangles and red handprints,” and that they used the internet and social media to broadcast their message, per The Guardian.
The Jerusalem Post reported additional allegations: the activists allegedly held meetings to identify targets, researched their personal details and business ownership, and discussed methods of harming them, including poison, bombs, and psychological torture. The Post quoted one defendant, Ahmet Kerem Korkaya, as allegedly saying, “I’m gonna be the dirtiest f*ing doctor ever...I’m gonna be [victim’s] doctor... poison her a slowly.” It also reported that another defendant, Paige Elizabeth Feyock, allegedly called for the conspirators to target the children of the targets.
These specific allegations of intent to harm were not detailed in The Guardian’s report, which focused more on the vandalism and the intimidation campaign.
The indictment also covers vandalism against companies operating in Michigan and against the Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Detroit, as reported by both outlets.
The University of Michigan has insisted it has no direct investments in companies with ties to Israel, with less than $15 million placed with funds that might include such companies, according to The Guardian.
Perspectives
Legal perspective: The case is being prosecuted as a conspiracy to transmit threats, which carries a maximum penalty of five years. The US attorney’s statement emphasizes the rule of law over fear, framing the alleged actions as anti-American.
University perspective: The University of Michigan has maintained it has no direct investments in companies with ties to Israel, responding to long-standing pro-Palestinian demands for divestment. The university’s investment policy is a central point of contention.
Activist perspective: While the article does not include direct quotes from the defendants or their attorneys, the indictment alleges the activists' actions were motivated by a desire for the university to divest from Israel. The defendants have not yet responded publicly, and the Associated Press could not immediately reach them for comment, as reported by The Guardian.