Lead

UK political leaders are stepping up pressure on Prime Minister Keir Starmer to restrict US military access to British bases and suspend joint defense projects, in the wake of President Donald Trump's warning that "a whole civilisation" would die if Iran did not comply with his demands. The calls span party lines, including senior Labour figures, opposition leaders, and even Trump's closest UK ally, Reform UK's Nigel Farage.

Coverage Comparison

Two reports from The Guardian detail the escalating debate. In one, Wales's first minister, Eluned Morgan, issued a public statement urging the UK government to halt the Deep Space Advanced Radar Capability (Darc) programme in Pembrokeshire, which is part of the Aukus defence partnership with the US and Australia. The other report focuses on demands from opposition leaders and some Labour MPs for Starmer to block US missions from British airbases, following Trump's Iran threat. The coverage highlights a growing divide within the Labour party and the broader UK political landscape over the reliability of the US as an ally.

Key Claims

  • Welsh First Minister Eluned Morgan called on Keir Starmer to suspend the Deep Space Advanced Radar Capability (Darc) programme, citing Trump's "contempt" for the UK and his threat to "annihilate" Iran. She argued that "the United States under Donald Trump is not the partner it once was" and that halting the project was necessary to ensure partnerships "reflect our values and our security interests."
  • The Darc programme, located in Morgan's Senedd constituency, is part of a planned global network of deep space tracking radars. Local campaign group Parc Against Darc has described it as "one of the most health-hazardous, tourism-ruining, skyline-blighting military installations ever proposed anywhere in the UK." Twelve Senedd members have voiced opposition to the project, including three from Labour.
  • In response to Trump's threat that "a whole civilisation" would die if Iran ignored his demands, the UK government has allowed US forces to use British bases only for defensive missions against Iran, such as targeting missile sites. Downing Street has declined to directly criticise Trump's comments, and a spokesperson refused to comment on the hypothetical scenario of US forces targeting civilian infrastructure.
  • Liberal Democrat leader Ed Davey and Green Party leader Zack Polanski called on Starmer to immediately block US missions from British or US-British airbases, including Diego Garcia and RAF Fairford. Davey warned that failing to do so "risks making the United Kingdom an accomplice to war crimes." Polanski described the US as "a rogue state carrying out war crimes and threatening more."
  • Some Labour MPs, including Stella Creasy and Emily Thornberry, have called for the UK to bar US forces entirely from using British bases for Iran missions, following Spain's decision to deny port access to US aircraft involved in attacks on Iran.
  • Even Nigel Farage, the Reform UK leader and a vocal Trump supporter, condemned the president's comments as going "way too far," according to the Guardian's report.

Perspectives

Welsh First Minister and Labour critics: Eluned Morgan and a dozen Senedd members, along with some Labour MPs, argue that the US under Trump no longer reflects shared values, and that the UK should suspend joint projects and restrict base access to avoid complicity in potential war crimes.

UK Government (Downing Street): Starmer's official spokesperson has declined to comment on Trump's remarks, emphasizing that UK bases are available only for defensive missions. The spokesperson refused to engage with hypothetical questions about US strikes on civilian infrastructure, suggesting a cautious, diplomatic approach.

Opposition leaders (Lib Dems, Greens): Ed Davey and Zack Polanski advocate immediate, decisive action to block US missions, framing the issue as a matter of UK legal and moral responsibility under international law.

Pro-US, pro-Trump perspective: While not directly quoted, Nigel Farage's reported criticism of Trump's comments indicates even supportive voices are alarmed, yet no source indicates support for curbing US access from this side.

Local campaigners and community voices: Parc Against Darc and local residents highlight the potential health, environmental, and aesthetic harms of the radar project, independent of the US political context.

This article synthesizes reporting from two Guardian articles. It does not independently verify all claims, and some statements, such as the characterization of US actions as potential war crimes, reflect the opinions of quoted sources rather than established fact.