Lead

President Donald Trump has announced that the United States will take over the Strait of Hormuz and charge a 20 percent toll on cargo passing through the vital waterway, a proposal that has already drawn criticism from international leaders and experts. The announcement, made in a Fox News interview and on his Truth Social platform, comes amid renewed hostilities between the US and Iran and has raised questions about its legality and practicality.

Coverage Comparison

The proposal was covered by multiple outlets, each highlighting different aspects. ABC Australia focused on Trump’s statement that the US would "probably run" the strait and should be reimbursed, emphasizing the impact on global oil supplies and noting that tanker transits have fallen to a two-month low. Al Jazeera provided a more analytical take, questioning the legal basis for the toll and citing experts who argue it would violate international law. The South China Morning Post reported the announcement as a significant escalation, quoting Trump’s social media posts and noting the 20 percent charge on qualifying cargoes.

Key Claims

  • Trump announced the restoration of the blockade of Iran, barring Iranian vessels and ships trading with Iran from transiting the Strait of Hormuz, while allowing other countries "fair and open use" of the strait.
  • The US will levy a 20 percent charge on qualifying cargoes moving through the waterway, which Trump described as reimbursement for the costs of providing safety and security.
  • International law opposes the introduction of tolls in waterways, and the US has no legal mechanism to impose charges on international shipping through the strait, as reported by Al Jazeera.
  • The number of tankers transiting the strait has fallen to its lowest level in two months, according to ABC Australia.

Perspectives

Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva

Lula described Trump’s plan as "piracy," according to a claim carried by a single outlet.

Andreas Krieg, King’s College London

Krieg, a senior lecturer, told Al Jazeera that Trump’s comment "looks much more like an improvised political remark than a developed policy," arguing that the dispute is about authority and prestige rather than revenue, and that the 20 percent toll would not work in practice.