Tertius News is an AI-native newsroom: an AI model reads the linked source articles below and extracts what each outlet reported, so you can compare their coverage side by side. How this works →
Pakistan says onus on Afghanistan to end hostilities
Pakistan has stated that Afghanistan must take visible and verifiable action against militant groups using its soil, as preliminary talks between the two neighbors conclude in China. The exchanges follow months of cross-border violence, with both sides trading accusations and diplomatic efforts failing to secure a permanent ceasefire.
Pakistan said Thursday (April 2, 2026) that the burden of ending its cross-border conflict lay with Afghanistan, as the two sides held preliminary talks to try to end hostilities. The neighbours and one-time allies have been locked in an escalating conflict over claims from Islamabad that Afghanistan is harbouring militants responsible for cross-border attacks, which the Taliban government denies.
Coverage comparison
Coverage of the developing situation varies by outlet. Deutsche Welle emphasized Pakistan's active military operations, describing the situation as an "open war" declared by Islamabad's defense minister in late February, followed by a bombing campaign. The Hindu, in contrast, focused on the diplomatic track, reporting the announcement of negotiations in Urumqi, northwest China, and the involvement of China as a mediator. Both outlets reported the core accusation and denial cycle, though with different narrative weights.
Key claims
Pakistan's Foreign Ministry spokesman Tahir Hussain Andrabi said the government hoped for a "durable solution" and that "the burden of real process, however, lies with Afghanistan, which must demonstrate visible and verifiable actions against terrorist groups using (its) soil against Pakistan."
Pakistan's Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar travelled to Beijing for talks with his Chinese counterpart, Wang Yi, as reported by The Hindu. The talks in Urumqi were announced Wednesday (April 1, 2026).
Beijing deployed a special envoy last month to try to broker a deal, according to The Hindu. That diplomatic effort was followed by Pakistani strikes on a Kabul rehab centre that prompted international condemnation. The Hindu reported that more than 400 people were killed in that attack, while the request for talks came from China.
The Taliban government said it sent a "mid-level delegation" to Urumqi and intends to hold "comprehensive and responsible talks" on good neighbourliness, trade, and security management, as stated by Foreign Ministry spokesman Abdul Qahar Balkhi.
Deutsche Welle reported that the fighting started in the fall of 2025, with Pakistani forces bombing border regions in Afghanistan and targeting Kabul. A "Pakistan-Afghanistan Peace Jirga" convened on March 31 in Peshawar, Pakistan, issued a resolution calling for an immediate ceasefire, though its practical effect remains unclear.
Reports have emerged of a Pakistani security zone stretching up to 32 kilometers inside Afghan territory, according to Deutsche Welle. These reports, which cite artillery fire, drone strikes, and blocked roads in eastern Afghan provinces, have not been independently verified.
Perspectives
Pakistan's position: Islamabad maintains that Afghanistan must act against militant groups like the Tehreek-e Taliban Pakistan (TTP), which it blames for attacks on Pakistani soil. Pakistani officials frame their actions as defensive and necessary, and argue that the resolution of the conflict depends on Afghan action.
Afghanistan's position: The Taliban government denies providing support to the TTP or other groups targeting Pakistan. Afghan officials have called for dialogue based on "good neighbourliness" and have expressed willingness to engage in talks, while also facing international condemnation over the Kabul rehab centre strike.
China's role: Beijing has positioned itself as a broker in the dispute, deploying a special envoy and hosting preliminary talks. China's involvement reflects its strategic interests in regional stability, though the outcome of its mediation remains uncertain.
International observers: Analysts quoted by Deutsche Welle note the deep historical and ethnic complexities of the border region, including the legacy of the Durand Line, and caution that the current peace jirga and negotiations may amount to political signaling unless backed by concrete actions from both sides.
How each outlet told it
Deutsche Welle
Framing: Pakistan's conflict with the Taliban — neutral/informative
Facts Included:
Pakistan is fighting the Taliban regime
Pakistani forces are bombing border regions in Afghanistan
A 'Pakistan-Afghanistan Peace Jirga' convened on March 31 in Peshawar, Pakistan
The assembly issued a resolution calling for an immediate ceasefire
Pakistan accuses Afghanistan's Taliban-ruled government of supporting militant groups like the Tehreek-e Taliban Pakistan (TTP)
The Taliban leadership in Afghanistan denies providing any support
Reports of a Pakistani security zone stretching up to 32 kilometers inside Afghan territory
Each row is one claim, attributed to the outlet whose wording states it most clearly. Confidence rates how directly the source text states the claim — explicit and unhedged rates high; hedged, pieced-together, or internally inconsistent statements rate lower. It does not measure whether the claim is true. Status counts the distinct outlets we found asserting it — so a single-source claim can still show high confidence, and a multi-source claim can show medium. Every one of those outlets is named beside the status, so you can check the count against the list. For claims extracted before we began storing that list, the row says so: it names the outlet the claim is quoted from and states that we have not recorded which outlets backed it. Outlets wrote at different times, so a figure that evolves — a casualty count, for example — can legitimately differ between rows; check the "as of" time next to each claim's source.
Claim
Confidence
Status
ClaimPakistan is fighting the Taliban regime. Pakistan accuses Afghanistan's Taliban-ruled government of supporting militant groups like the Tehreek-e Taliban Pakistan (TTP).
ConfidenceHigh
StatusMulti-source quoted from Deutsche Wellethe outlets behind this status were not recorded for this claim
ClaimPakistani forces are bombing border regions in Afghanistan.
ConfidenceHigh
StatusMulti-source quoted from Deutsche Wellethe outlets behind this status were not recorded for this claim
ClaimA 'Pakistan-Afghanistan Peace Jirga' convened on March 31 in Peshawar, Pakistan, and issued a resolution calling for an immediate ceasefire.