Lead
The Bank of Russia identified 1,400 entities with signs of illegal activity in the financial market during the first quarter of 2026, according to the regulator's report released on May 5. The number of illegal operators in the securities market fell by 19% compared to the previous quarter, while illegal lenders saw a 36% increase.
Coverage Comparison
Two reports from TASS, the Russian state news agency, covered the Bank of Russia's data. The first focused on the overall financial market, highlighting the 1,400 illegal entities and the predominance of online investment fraud. The second report drilled down into the securities market, noting the decline in illegal operators and the rise in illegal lenders. Both articles drew exclusively from the regulator's official statements and data, with no independent analysis or comment from external experts.
Key Claims
Overall Illegal Entities
According to the Bank of Russia, 1,400 entities with signs of illegal activity were identified from January to March 2026. Of these, 656 were classified as "pseudo-investment projects." The total represented a 9% increase from the fourth quarter of 2025, the regulator said. TASS reported that more than 60% of the identified entities were online projects engaged in investment fraud, including financial pyramids, illegal brokers, and forex dealers.
Securities Market Decline
In the securities market specifically, 257 internet projects with signs of illegal professional participants were identified in Q1 2026, a 19% decrease from the previous quarter, according to the Bank of Russia. These included 161 illegal forex dealers and 67 illegal brokers. The regulator also noted that among the 2,500 websites targeted for blocking related to illegal professional participants, nearly 2,000 were duplicate sites. The report emphasized that these illegal operators often "manipulate" trades in client accounts or hide behind non-existent licenses from foreign regulators.
Crypto Wallets and Investment Fraud
Illegal brokers and forex dealers used more than 2,000 crypto wallets to raise funds, per the Bank of Russia. The regulator observed that trading on crypto exchanges remained a popular service among these illegal operators. TASS reported that online projects continued to dominate investment fraud, with many identified shortly after creation and their "mirror" sites blocked simultaneously.
Rise in Illegal Lenders
The Bank of Russia identified 472 entities with signs of illegal lending in Q1 2026, a 36% increase from the previous quarter. The regulator noted that 54% of these operated exclusively online, using social media pages and groups to advertise their services. More than 1,300 illegal online resources were blocked, including over 800 social media pages. Offline, illegal loans were often issued by pseudo-pawnshops and online consignment stores, which disguised transactions through purchase-sale, storage, and commission agreements. Some entities used names resembling those of licensed lenders, such as microfinance organizations or credit cooperatives, to mislead customers.
Regulatory Actions
The Bank of Russia helped restrict access to more than 7,400 online resources of illegal financial market operators in Q1 2026, a 30% increase from Q4 2025, according to the regulator. TASS reported that the regulator forwarded information on all identified illegal activity to law enforcement agencies. Based on the Bank of Russia's data, more than 150 administrative cases were initiated and more than 200 other measures, including claims and advertising-related actions, were taken during the quarter.
Perspectives
The Bank of Russia frames its quarterly data as evidence of ongoing regulatory vigilance and adaptation to evolving illegal tactics. The increase in illegal lenders, especially those operating exclusively online, suggests that enforcement efforts may need to shift toward digital platforms. However, the decline in illegal securities market operators indicates some progress in that sector. TASS's coverage, as a state-owned outlet, presents the regulator's figures without external scrutiny, which may reflect the official government perspective. No independent experts or consumer advocacy voices are included in the reports, leaving the impact of these illegal activities on investors and the public largely unexamined.