Lead
Nearly 50 asylum seekers who were deported under the UK's 'one in one out' scheme have returned to the UK a second time, according to figures learned by the Guardian. The scheme, which began last September, allows the UK government to return people arriving on small boats to France in exchange for a similar number of asylum seekers being brought to the UK legally. The aim is to deter asylum seekers from crossing the Channel in small boats.
The number of returnees detained by the Home Office is 47, but an unknown number are believed to have arrived undetected. The Guardian previously revealed that the first asylum seeker to return a second time did so last October, a few weeks after being forcibly returned to France, but until now the scale of repeat returns was not known.
Coverage Comparison
The Guardian's reporting focuses on two angles: the apparent ineffectiveness of the scheme in deterring asylum seekers, and a legal challenge that has ordered the Home Office to bring back an alleged trafficking victim. Both articles draw on official figures and court rulings, with the second piece highlighting a high court judge's decision to quash a Home Office policy change.
The first article frames the repeat returns as evidence that the policy's deterrent effect is limited, noting that asylum seekers who returned have cited threats from people smugglers in France or fears of being returned by French authorities to their home countries. The second article adopts a more objective tone, centered on the legal success of the challenge.
Key Claims
- Almost 50 asylum seekers deported under the 'one in one out' scheme have returned to the UK a second time, as reported by the Guardian.
- The scheme allows the UK government to return people arriving on small boats to France in exchange for a similar number of asylum seekers being brought to the UK legally.
- Small boat crossings have reduced by about 43% this year, according to the Guardian. This reduction is attributed to a combination of factors, including bad weather, a drop in migrants arriving in Europe overall, and efforts by UK and French authorities to disrupt people smugglers.
- About 4% of small boat arrivals have been returned to France under the 'one in one out' deal. According to Home Office figures cited by the Guardian, as of 30 June 2026, 1,117 individuals had been transferred to the UK and 1,087 individuals returned to France under the scheme.
- A high court judge, Mr Justice Sheldon, has ordered the Home Office to bring an alleged victim of trafficking forcibly removed to France under the scheme back to the UK. This is the first ruling of its kind, and it could lead to more people being brought back.
- The judge quashed a Home Office policy change that refused asylum seekers the right to have their trafficking claims reconsidered after an initial rejection. He stated: "I have quashed it so that it is as if it never happened."
- The man the judge ordered to be brought back is an asylum seeker from Sudan, a survivor of torture, and one of five people who challenged the home secretary's policy change. He was forcibly returned to France on 27 November 2025.
- A second asylum seeker involved in the legal challenge will have his trafficking case reconsidered in France.
- Four people died attempting to cross the Channel in the last week, and more than 1,000 people arrived in that period, according to the Guardian.
- Asylum seekers returned to France now have a right to have trafficking cases initially rejected reconsidered. However, many who previously claimed to have been trafficked have disappeared, some going underground after threats from smugglers or fleeing France after being threatened with removal.
Perspectives
The Guardian's reporting includes the Home Office's official figures and the rationale for the scheme: that France is a safe country and that returning a proportion of small boat arrivals will deter crossings. However, the articles also present the perspectives of asylum seekers who have returned, arguing that they faced threats from people smugglers in France or feared being returned by French authorities to their home countries. Advocacy groups and legal experts are quoted, framing the Home Office's decision-making as unlawful in the trafficking case. The high court judge's ruling represents a judicial perspective, emphasizing the rights of alleged trafficking victims.