Tertius News is an AI-native newsroom: an AI model reads the source articles linked below — on this story, all of them from one outlet — and extracts what that outlet reported, claim by claim. How this works →

Russia accuses Ukraine, West of restricting media freedom at UN committee session

At a UN committee meeting, Russia's UN envoy Vasily Nebenzya accused Ukraine of attacking civilians and journalists, banning opposition media, and promoting hatred, while also criticizing the West for imposing censorship and the UN for using biased sources. The claims were reported solely by TASS, Russia's state news agency.

By Tertius News AI Desk 1 outlet · 2 articles Version 1 Coverage Apr 28, 2026 Published Aug 13

Lead

Russia's Permanent Representative to the United Nations, Vasily Nebenzya, used a meeting of the UN General Assembly Committee on Information to accuse Ukraine's government of attacking civilians and journalists, banning opposition media, and promoting hatred of Russians, while also criticizing Western countries for imposing censorship and the UN for relying on biased sources. His remarks, delivered at the committee's 48th session on April 28, were reported by TASS, Russia's state news agency.

Coverage Comparison

The only coverage of these statements comes from TASS, which published two reports on the speech. Both reports focus on Nebenzya's criticisms of Ukraine and the West. No independent or Western media reports on these specific remarks were available in the sources provided.

Key Claims

In his address, Nebenzya made several specific assertions:

Ukraine continues to carry out attacks on Russia's civilian population, including journalists, and 'openly flaunts' these actions. He cited figures that in 2025, Ukrainian army attacks killed six Russian journalists, and one correspondent narrowly survived a drone attack in 2026.
Ukraine has banned opposition media, blocked thousands of websites, and is persecuting dissidents. He also said that 'hatred of everything Russian is openly promoted and encouraged through the media at all levels.'
The 'collective West' is attempting to control the global information space, suppress dissent, and manipulate international public opinion. He accused Western countries of using 'a wide range of political censorship measures,' including sanctions against media outlets and journalists, and 'repressive actions against their families.'
Ukraine's Mirotvorets website, which he described as 'extremist,' is registered in a Western country and illegally collects and publishes personal data of journalists and others.
The US denied an entry visa to a member of the Russian delegation to the UN Committee on Information session.
The UN often uses biased sources when responding to crimes against Russian media, and numerous human rights NGOs 'pick and choose' which crimes to acknowledge.

All of these claims come from Nebenzya's own statements, as relayed by TASS, and have not been independently verified.

Perspectives

Russian Government Perspective

Nebenzya's remarks reflect the Kremlin's longstanding narrative that Ukraine and Western nations are restricting media freedom and targeting Russian journalists. His comments about the Mirotvorets website and visa denials align with previous Russian complaints about Western and Ukrainian actions.

Ukraine and Western Perspective

No Ukrainian or Western response to these specific remarks was included in the provided coverage. In general, Ukraine has denied targeting journalists and has accused Russia of censorship and propaganda. Western governments have defended their sanctions and visa policies as measures to counter Russian disinformation and support press freedom.

United Nations Perspective

The UN has not publicly commented on Nebenzya's statements. The Committee on Information is a forum where member states regularly express contrasting views on media freedom.

Conclusion

Nebenzya's speech at the UN Committee on Information highlights the deep divisions between Russia and Ukraine over media freedom and information access. While his claims were reported by TASS, they remain unverified by independent sources. The full text of his remarks and any responses from other delegates were not included in the provided coverage.

How this outlet told it

A framing line is our reading of that outlet's own text — an interpretation, not a quotation and not a fact we assert. Check it against what the outlet published.

TASS — English as of Apr 28, 2026, 5:45 PM UTC

Framing: Our reading Russia accuses Ukraine and the West of restricting freedom of information — critical

Facts Included:

Russian Permanent Representative to the UN Vasily Nebenzya accused Ukraine's authorities of attacking civilians and journalists
Ukraine has banned opposition media, blocked thousands of websites, and persecuted dissidents
The West has imposed bans on free information and used political censorship measures
Ukraine's Mirotvorets extremist website has been registered in a Western country
The US denied an entry visa to a member of the Russian delegation to the UN Committee on Information session

Read the source article →

TASS — English as of Apr 28, 2026, 5:15 PM UTC

Framing: Our reading Russia criticizes the UN's use of biased sources — disapproving

Facts Included:

The UN often uses biased sources to respond to crimes against the Russian media
Numerous human rights NGOs pick and choose which crimes against the Russian media to acknowledge

Read the source article →

What was claimed, and who backed it

AI-extracted; can misattribute a claim — see Methodology.

Each row is one claim, attributed to the outlet whose wording states it most clearly. Confidence rates how directly the source text states the claim — explicit and unhedged rates high; hedged, pieced-together, or internally inconsistent statements rate lower. It does not measure whether the claim is true. Status counts the distinct outlets we found asserting it — so a single-source claim can still show high confidence, and a multi-source claim can show medium. Every one of those outlets is named beside the status, so you can check the count against the list. For claims extracted before we began storing that list, the row says so: it names the outlet the claim is quoted from and states that we have not recorded which outlets backed it. Outlets wrote at different times, so a figure that evolves — a casualty count, for example — can legitimately differ between rows; check the "as of" time next to each claim's source.

Claim	Confidence	Status
ClaimRussian Permanent Representative to the UN Vasily Nebenzya accused Ukraine's authorities of attacking civilians and journalists.	ConfidenceHigh	StatusSingle-source via TASS — English as of Apr 28, 2026, 5:45 PM UTC
ClaimUkraine has banned opposition media, blocked thousands of websites, and persecuted dissidents.	ConfidenceHigh	StatusSingle-source via TASS — English as of Apr 28, 2026, 5:45 PM UTC
ClaimThe West has imposed bans on free information and used political censorship measures.	ConfidenceHigh	StatusSingle-source via TASS — English as of Apr 28, 2026, 5:45 PM UTC
ClaimUkraine's Mirotvorets extremist website has been registered in a Western country.	ConfidenceHigh	StatusSingle-source via TASS — English as of Apr 28, 2026, 5:45 PM UTC
ClaimThe US denied an entry visa to a member of the Russian delegation to the UN Committee on Information session.	ConfidenceHigh	StatusSingle-source via TASS — English as of Apr 28, 2026, 5:45 PM UTC
ClaimThe UN often uses biased sources to respond to crimes against the Russian media.	ConfidenceMedium	StatusSingle-source via TASS — English as of Apr 28, 2026, 5:15 PM UTC
ClaimNumerous human rights NGOs pick and choose which crimes against the Russian media to acknowledge.	ConfidenceMedium	StatusSingle-source via TASS — English as of Apr 28, 2026, 5:15 PM UTC

Transparency & Audit Trail

1 outlet · 2 articles consulted: TASS — English 7 claims extracted Version 1 Written 2026-08-13