Lead

South Korea's two state-owned nuclear power giants have been failing to cooperate on overseas projects, leading to overlapping expenditures and inefficiencies, according to the country's Board of Audit and Inspection (BAI). In response, the government has announced plans to establish a new public-private committee to streamline the export system and foster closer coordination between the two firms.

Coverage Comparison

Two reports from Yonhap News Agency, South Korea's leading wire service, detail the auditor's findings and the government's subsequent action. The first, published on May 7, focuses on the BAI's audit conclusions, highlighting repeated failures by Korea Electric Power Corp. (KEPCO) and Korea Hydro & Nuclear Power Co. (KHNP) to share information, technology, or personnel. The second, from May 14, describes the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Resources' plan for a new committee and joint project development, set against the backdrop of global nuclear expansion.

Key Claims

  • Audit findings: According to Yonhap's report on the BAI audit, KEPCO and KHNP have failed to cooperate properly on nuclear power plant export projects, resulting in overlapping expenditures and other inefficiencies. The audit found that the two firms perform overlapping functions, each operating large workforces dedicated to nuclear power exports — KEPCO with 567 people across 10 departments, and KHNP with 216 people across six departments.
  • Specific cooperation failures: The BAI documented instances of noncooperation, including KEPCO refusing to share cost information from the UAE's Barakah project while KHNP was bidding in the Czech Republic, and KHNP unilaterally withdrawing personnel loaned for the UAE project and responding lukewarmly to KEPCO's requests for support on a Saudi Arabia project. The auditor warned that such lack of cooperation "could have even harmed national credibility."
  • Government response: The industry ministry announced on May 14 that a new nuclear power plant export planning committee will be established, headed by the ministry's director general for nuclear power plant strategy and planning. The committee will include executives from KEPCO, KHNP, and other companies, as well as field experts.
  • Joint development plan: Under the government plan, KEPCO and KHNP will jointly develop all export-related projects, except for KHNP's ongoing projects in the Czech Republic and the Philippines, with KEPCO taking the lead in external negotiations.
  • Auditor's recommendation: The BAI suggested that the two companies sign a memorandum of understanding specifying cooperation criteria and strengthen coordination through a joint nuclear power export council.

Perspectives

The audit's perspective, as reported by Yonhap, is critical of the two companies' relationship, framing their failures as a national concern that could undermine South Korea's credibility in overseas markets. The government's perspective, relayed through the industry ministry, is forward-looking and supportive, emphasizing the need for the public and private sectors to work as "one team" and expressing confidence in a "nuclear renaissance." Both reports reflect an official, institutional viewpoint, with no independent commentary or critical analysis beyond the auditor's findings.

The story also highlights a long-standing tension between the two entities, which were involved in a high-profile legal dispute over additional construction costs in the UAE's Barakah project. The government's new committee and joint development mandate appear designed to force coordination where voluntary cooperation has been lacking.

As the global nuclear power industry sees renewed interest, South Korea is seeking to capitalize on its expertise, particularly after a consortium led by KHNP won an estimated 26 trillion-won ($17.4 billion) deal in the Czech Republic last year. The industry minister pointed to opportunities in the United States, Czech Republic, and Vietnam, saying the government would revamp the export system and seek legislation to strengthen support.

Whether the new committee and joint project structure will resolve the deep-seated coordination issues remains to be seen, but the government's move signals a recognition that internal friction has been a drag on its nuclear export ambitions.