Lead

New data has revealed that more than 2.7 tonnes of antibiotics were used at a single Tasmanian salmon farm lease in just two months, raising concerns among environmentalists and scientists about the impact on marine ecosystems and human health. The Tasmanian Environment Protection Authority (EPA) released a report on the use of florfenicol at the Zuidpool lease in the D'Entrecasteaux Channel, but the total amount that entered public waterways across all nine leases that used the antibiotic over summer remains unknown, according to the ABC.

The disclosure comes as Tasmania's salmon industry, hit hard by an outbreak of bacterial disease, launches a statewide advertising campaign to defend its practices. Data cited in the reports shows that more than 13,500 tonnes of fish died due to the bacterial disease piscirickettsia salmonis between January and March last year, and that despite the use of antibiotics, more than 9,000 tonnes of fish died in the first three months of this year.

Coverage Comparison

Coverage of the issue has focused on two main aspects: the alarming scale of antibiotic use and its consequences, and the industry's public relations response.

The ABC reported that the EPA's report on the Zuidpool lease revealed the 2.7-tonne figure, which it described as "shockingly large" and "astoundingly high." The outlet also noted that the permit for florfenicol use was revoked on March 4 after traces were found in wild shellfish more than 10 kilometres away.

In a separate article, the ABC focused on the industry's advertising campaign, "Tasmanians Depend on Salmon," which features testimonials from workers. The campaign comes as the industry faces ongoing public scrutiny over the antibiotic's use. The ABC reported that EPA monitoring at two Tassal leases still found florfenicol residue levels above the limit of reporting, nearly two months after the permit was revoked.

Key Claims

The following claims have been reported and cross-verified across multiple sources:

  • More than 2.7 tonnes of antibiotics (florfenicol) were used at a single Tasmanian salmon farm lease in two months, according to EPA data.
  • Between January and March last year, more than 13,500 tonnes of fish died from piscirickettsia salmonis, a bacterial disease.
  • Despite the use of antibiotics, over 9,000 tonnes of farmed salmon died in the first three months of this year.
  • The permit to use florfenicol was revoked on March 4 after traces were found in wild shellfish.
A claim carried by a single outlet notes that the total amount of florfenicol used across all leases remains unknown to the public, although Salmon Tasmania's chief executive has said an EPA report is forthcoming that will detail the exact quantity. This has not been independently confirmed.

Perspectives

Environmental and Scientific Concerns

Greens leader Rosalie Woodruff called the 2.7-tonne figure "shockingly large" for just one site, questioning why the public doesn't know what's happening at other leases. "It's never been tested, the impacts on the marine life, and for that quantity to be going into waterways is an astoundingly high amount," she said.

Mark Blaskovich, an antibiotic resistance expert at the University of Queensland, described the use of such a large amount as "alarming." He explained that florfenicol is closely related to a human antibiotic called chloramphenicol, and that bacteria resistant to one may become resistant to the other. "By pumping these large amounts of florfenicol into the environment, it potentially means that bacteria in the environment can become resistant and that resistance mechanism can end up being transferred to bacteria that might end up infecting humans," he warned.

Industry Response

Salmon Tasmania, the industry body, launched a statewide advertising campaign to counter criticism. Chief executive John Whittington said the campaign was intended to "make sure the truth of our industry is out there for people to make their own judgements on." He noted that the EPA is about to release a report detailing the exact quantity of florfenicol used over summer.

The industry has been hit hard by the bacterial outbreak, losing significant stock, which may explain the high antibiotic use. However, critics argue that the scale of use and the lack of public data are unacceptable.

Regulatory Actions

The EPA revoked the permit for florfenicol use on March 4 following detections in wild shellfish. Residual monitoring at two Tassal leases continued past that date, with levels still above the limit of reporting. An EPA spokesperson said monitoring would continue until two consecutive reports below the threshold are received.