Lead

Hamas's acceptance of a roadmap for relinquishing its weapons has been described as "the most important opening yet" in the push for a lasting ceasefire, but analysts and officials caution that the plan's success hinges on strict verification and careful sequencing of commitments.

Coverage Comparison

The Jerusalem Post's opinion and analysis pieces present a spectrum of perspectives on the proposal. One editorial highlights the plan as a crucial opportunity, while another voices skepticism about Hamas's intentions, noting the group has previously used negotiations to gain time and preserve control. A third report, citing a senior Palestinian-American scholar, frames Hamas's stated willingness to disarm as unprecedented, even as it acknowledges Israeli caution.

Key Claims

  • Hamas has accepted a roadmap for relinquishing its weapons, based on the 20-Point Plan provided by President Trump.
  • The United States, Egypt, Qatar, and Türkiye sustained difficult mediation, and the Board of Peace kept the process alive through months of mistrust.
  • Disarmament must be reciprocal and verifiable, and an International Stabilization Force should be politically led and supported by robust civilian, policing, and military capacities.
  • Hamas has spent the period since October 7 using every negotiation to gain time, preserve control, and push difficult questions into the next phase, and Israel cannot base a withdrawal on what Hamas says it intends to do.
  • The proposal envisions a 10-to-15-year hudna, or ceasefire, under which Hamas would also give up all of its weapons.
  • Hamas has come under significant pressure from other Palestinian factions to permanently abandon armed struggle, and security guarantees for its members and leaders after disarmament are a high priority.

Perspectives

Hamas's Seriousness

Dr. Bishara Bahbah, a Palestinian-American scholar and former mediator, told the Jerusalem Post that Hamas has signaled an unprecedented willingness to relinquish its military capabilities. He said the group has already presented a detailed demilitarization proposal to the Trump administration, including commits to surrender weapons, halt military activity, and abandon tunnels in exchange for a long-term ceasefire and Israeli withdrawal. "I think the Palestinian side, including Hamas, is very serious about the proposal they have put together," he said.

Israeli Caution

An editorial in the Jerusalem Post warns that Israel cannot agree to a process where withdrawal, reconstruction, or political recognition move forward on the assumption that Hamas will disarm later. It argues that disarmament must be physical and verifiable, not just appear in a document. "The issue is not whether disarmament appears in the document - it does - the issue is whether Hamas is required to carry it out before Israel gives up the leverage needed to make it happen," the editorial states.

A Call for Reciprocity

A co-authored piece by Hiba Qasas and Nadav Tamir, who addressed the UN Security Council together, calls for disarmament to be reciprocal and verifiable. They warn against treating it as a "ceremony with a deadline," drawing on examples from Northern Ireland and Colombia where phased handovers were paired with independent verification. They call on Israel to accept the roadmap and for both sides to move forward with "reciprocal confidence-building measures."