Green Party motion to scrap Tasers and pepper spray draws sharp rebuke from former officers

A motion put forward by a Green Party working group proposing that police officers stop using Tasers and pepper spray, which it labels 'lethal tools,' has sparked anger among former police officers who say the plan would undermine public safety.

The motion, drawn up by the party's crime and justice working group, also calls for the government to strip funding from policing, prisons, and surveillance, and to scrap the Prevent counter-terrorism programme. According to the motion, the party also wants to end police presence in schools and work towards closing all prisons 'through systemic obsolescence.'

Former officers react

The proposals have been met with strong criticism from several former officers. Lucy Hutley, a former detective constable with Essex Police, said the plan was 'absolutely insane' and gave criminals and terrorists a 'free pass to conduct a reign of terror' in the UK. She added that even her 14-year-old considered the idea ridiculous, and asked how officers would be expected to protect themselves without access to CS spray or Tasers.

Stuart Henderson, who spent 28 years serving with the Metropolitan Police Service and in Hampshire, stressed the importance of Tasers and CS spray in keeping officers safe. He said officers need these tools to protect themselves and the public.

Kul Mahar, a retired superintendent with Derbyshire Police, described the proposal as 'incredibly reckless.' He noted that the police service is still recovering from a period of underfunding, a factor he said should be taken into account when considering changes to police equipment.

Kerry Snuggs, who has served as a special constable for four years and in a regular role in HR for 17 years, said the proposal is 'out of touch with policing.' She stressed that officers need lawful, proportionate, responsible force options to do their jobs safely.

Context to a decision

The motion was drawn up by the Green Party's crime and justice working group, which is chaired by Zack Polanski. There is no set date for a vote on the motion at a party conference, and there is no indication of when members might debate the proposal.