Tertius News is an AI-native newsroom: an AI model reads the linked source articles below and extracts what each outlet reported, so you can compare their coverage side by side. How this works →
New information became available — this story may be updated shortly.
Amnesty report alleges excessive force against Indian student protesters; government denies
Amnesty International has accused Indian police of using excessive force, including pellet guns and electric shock devices, during July's youth-led protests over exam leaks. The government and police deny the allegations, while the Supreme Court has set up a panel to investigate. Union minister Kiren Rijiju has defended the police, saying no one was seriously injured.
By Tertius News AI Desk5 distinct · 9 mastheads · 10 articlesVersion 3Coverage Published
Amnesty report alleges excessive force against Indian student protesters
Amnesty International has released a report alleging that Indian police used excessive force, including pellet-firing shotguns, tear gas launchers, grenades, batons, and electric shock devices, against youth-led protests in Delhi and Bihar in July. The report, published on Monday, clashes with police accounts that force was used only after protesters turned violent. It comes after India's Supreme Court set up a panel on August 20 to investigate violence by both police and demonstrators.
The protests, led by the online Cockroach Janta Party (CJP), were sparked by the leak of the national medical entrance test and broadened into a wider movement over unemployment and opportunities for young people. The demonstrations turned violent on July 20 when thousands of protesters attempted to march towards parliament in New Delhi. The protests forced the resignation of then-education minister Dharmendra Pradhan, marking a significant political defeat for Prime Minister Narendra Modi.
Amnesty said witness testimony and visual evidence it had verified confirmed the use of the weapons. The organization also said it verified two instances of a police officer "unlawfully using lethal force against a crowd" in Bihar's Siwan district, though no one was killed. In one case, a video appeared to show a police officer using an AK-type assault rifle against protesters. Amnesty said the weapons were deployed in a manner that breached international law and standards and domestic policing guidelines.
Police and government respond
Delhi Police have denied using excessive force, telling the Supreme Court that they used force only after protesters "resorted to violence." They said anti-social elements "masquerading as aggrieved students" caused "grievous injuries" to security forces, and that 240 personnel were injured. On social media, Delhi Police called reports of pellet gun use "completely false and misleading."
Bihar Police told the Supreme Court that a constable fired four rounds in the air during the protests in Siwan and that no one was injured. They agreed that the AK-47 is a "platoon-level weapon" used in special operations, not for crowd control, but denied using excessive force.
Union minister Kiren Rijiju has also defended the police. He said cops should be praised for handling the protests "so peacefully" and claimed that "not one" lathi was used. Rijiju said no one died, broke a bone, or got seriously injured, and that criminals joined the agitation under the guise of students. He asked, "Kahan goli chali hai?" (Where were shots ).
Allegations of pellet injuries
Amnesty's report includes accounts of protesters who said they were hit by pellets. One anonymous protester said doctors confirmed his injuries were caused by pellets. A 19-year-old student, Sahil Lochab, lost vision in one eye and had more than 200 pellets in his body, according to a complaint. His complaint stated that doctors told him the possibility of his eyesight returning was less than 1 percent.
CJP founder Abhijeet Dipke said he spoke to two alleged victims, Sahil and Vikas, who were protesting peacefully when they were hit by pellets fired by police. He said Sahil, a political science student, had appeared for the Delhi Police exam in 2025, which he alleged was leaked. Dipke said, "The police and the govt deny brutality, but how do they explain this?"
At least four people have alleged pellet gun injuries: Sheikh Irshad Mansuri, Sahil Lochab, a reporter who did not wish to be named, and Prashant, a 25-year-old Bihar resident. Prashant's discharge paper read "Multiple pellet injuries to the right upper limb, chest and inguinal region." Hindustan Times reported that at least a dozen Rapid Action Force personnel were issued pellet guns on the morning of July 20, but the arms were withdrawn after claims of use. A general diary entry from Parliament Street police station showed that on July 20, 55 Non Electrical shells, 15 Electrical shells, 5 Tear Smoke Grenades, and anti-riot guns with ballistic cartridges and plastic pellets were used.
Political fallout
Opposition leader Rahul Gandhi staged a sit-in outside a Delhi police station on August 21 with Sahil Lochab, demanding an investigation. Police later registered a case over the complaint. Gandhi said, "This is a pellet gun… his eye has been damaged, he has lost his vision." He also called on Home Minister Amit Shah to answer questions, arguing that either Shah ordered the use of lethal weapons, making him guilty, or he was unaware, making him incompetent. The opposition demanded a statement from Shah regarding the alleged use of lathis, tear gas, shock batons, and pellet guns. Some opposition leaders alleged that questions raised by parliamentarians are routinely disallowed or left unanswered.
Continuing protests
The protests have continued beyond Delhi. In Patna, Bihar, students and unemployed youth clashed with police as they marched towards the chief minister's residence, demanding jobs and transparency in recruitment exams. Police used water cannons and lathis, and detained at least 25 protesters, who were later released, according to the Indian Express. Patna Police Superintendent Kartikeya K Sharma said action would be taken against those involved in stone pelting. Bihar Chief Minister Samrat Choudhary said his office was "listening to every student's voice," and Bihar Education Minister Mithilesh Tiwari said the government had addressed students' demands and the door for dialogue remained "wide open." Similar demonstrations have occurred in other states, including Karnataka.
The Supreme Court has constituted a five-member committee headed by former judge R Subhash Reddy to investigate the violence. The committee's mandate is to look into allegations of violence by both police and demonstrators.
How each outlet told it
A framing line is our reading of that outlet's own text — an interpretation, not a quotation and not a fact we assert. Check it against what the outlet published.
Framing: The headline emphasizes the ongoing police-protest clash a month after the Gen Z demonstrations. — The tone is neutral and factual, reporting events without overt emotional language.
Facts Included:
Police used water cannons and batons against protesters in Bihar's capital Patna.
A few thousand protesters broke through security barricades.
At least 25 protesters were detained in Patna and later released, according to the Indian Express newspaper.
Patna Police Superintendent Kartikeya K Sharma said police would identify those involved in stone pelting and take action.
Protests began last week with unemployed youth demanding jobs and later expanded to include calls for education reform.
Bihar Chief Minister Samrat Choudhary said his office was 'listening to every student's voice'.
A delegation of student representatives met Bihar's top bureaucrat Pratyaya Amrit, who said the discussion 'was positive, and we were assured of a favourable response within a couple of days'.
Similar demonstrations occurred in other states, including a protest by a BJP-linked student body in Karnataka.
The Cockroach movement in New Delhi announced a march next month to protest the Modi government's failure to fulfil promises, including withdrawal of police cases against protesters.
The July resignation of Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan marked a significant political defeat for PM Modi, who has tried to maintain a strongman image while India's democratic indices declined under his rule.
Framing: Headline emphasizes the use of pellets and grenades against Gen Z protesters, framing it as a report by Amnesty International.
Facts Included:
Amnesty International confirmed Indian government forces used lethal weapons, including pellet-firing shotguns, grenades, batons and electric shock devices against demonstrators.
On July 20, thousands of protesters blocked Parliament Street in New Delhi, demanding the resignation of then-Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan.
More than 100 students were injured in the crackdown by police and paramilitary forces.
Indian newspapers obtained hospital records showing doctors treated pellet wounds.
Police did not issue a public warning before firing pellet guns, as recommended by the Indian government’s Bureau for Police Research and Development.
Delhi Police called reports of pellet injuries “fake news” and warned of legal action.
An internal inquiry by India’s paramilitary forces reportedly found personnel fired at least seven rounds of ammunition containing metal pellets.
Aakar Patel, chair of Amnesty International India, said authorities suppressed the protest with a communication blackout, barricades, transport disruption, and excessive force.
Government forces used tear gas grenades to disperse crowds, and Amnesty noted they were launched directly at protesters, contrary to UN guidance.
Amnesty verified police used lathis (batons) to beat protesters, which the UN special rapporteur considers inherently cruel.
Video showed men in civilian clothing beating protesters while uniformed officers stood by without intervening.
CJP founder Abhijeet Dipke said every police person who attacked protesters would be identified and dragged to courts.
Opposition leader Rahul Gandhi staged a seven-hour sit-in outside the Delhi Police chief's office, pressing for a case over pellet gun use.
Sahil Lochab, a 19-year-old student, lost vision in one eye due to pellet injuries and wrote in his complaint that over 200 pellets remained in his body, with less than 1 percent chance of eyesight returning.
Framing: The headline emphasizes the accusation of excessive force by Indian police against protesters, attributing the claim to Amnesty International. — The tone is critical of police actions, reporting the human rights group's findings and including police justifications but giving more weight to the allegations.
Facts Included:
Amnesty International said on Monday that Indian police used excessive force, including electric shock devices and pellet guns, during youth-led protests.
The protests were triggered by the leak of the national medical entrance test and turned violent on July 20 when thousands of protesters attempted to march towards parliament in New Delhi.
Amnesty said witness testimony and visual evidence it had verified confirmed the use of 'pellet-firing shotguns, tear gas launchers, grenades, batons and electric shock devices against protesters' in Delhi and the eastern state of Bihar.
Amnesty said it had verified two instances of a police officer 'unlawfully using lethal force against a crowd' in Bihar’s Siwan district; no one was killed.
The weapons were deployed in a manner that breached international law and standards and domestic policing guidelines, according to Amnesty.
Amnesty said there were 'isolated incidents of protesters throwing stones', but that the 'heavy-handed response was state-sanctioned violence masked as crowd control'.
Delhi Police said in a Supreme Court hearing last week they had used force only after protesters 'resorted to violence'.
Police said anti-social elements 'masquerading as aggrieved students' caused 'grievous injuries' to security forces.
On Friday, opposition leader Rahul Gandhi staged a sit-in outside a Delhi police station with a 19-year-old protester who said he was injured by pellets during the July 20 demonstration.
Gandhi demanded a police investigation into the shooting, and officers later registered a case over the complaint.
The protests were led by the online Cockroach Janta Party (CJP) and broadened from anger over exam irregularities into a wider movement over unemployment, opportunities for young people and what critics describe as Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s increasingly authoritarian rule.
The protests proved to be the biggest challenge that Modi has faced after winning a third term in 2024.
Framing: Police used 'excessive force' on CJP protesters
Facts Included:
Amnesty International alleged that police in New Delhi and Bihar used excessive force against CJP protesters.
Amnesty's report comes days after the Supreme Court formed a panel to probe allegations of violence.
Amnesty verified video, photographic evidence, and witness testimony of weapons use including pellet-firing shotguns, tear gas launchers, grenades, batons, and electric shock devices.
Amnesty quoted an anonymous protester who said he sustained pellet injuries; doctors confirmed the injuries.
Delhi Police posted on X deeming reports of pellet gun use as 'completely false and misleading'.
Opposition leader Rahul Gandhi staged a sit-in with a 19-year-old protester demanding a police investigation.
The protests were sparked by the leak of question papers for a medical college entrance exam.
India's then-education minister Dharmendra Pradhan stepped down due to the protests.
Three newborns died in a fire at a government hospital in Maharashtra.
India's Foreign Minister S Jaishankar is in Russia co-chairing the India-Russia Inter-Governmental Commission.
Framing: Headline emphasizes Amnesty International's accusation of excessive force by police.
Facts Included:
Indian police used excessive force, including electric shock devices and pellet guns, against youth-led protests, Amnesty International said on Monday.
The protests forced the education minister to resign last month.
The report clashes with the police account that force was used only after protesters turned violent.
India's Supreme Court set up a panel on Thursday to investigate violence by both police and demonstrators.
Demonstrations in New Delhi turned violent on 20 July when thousands attempted to march towards parliament.
Amnesty verified two instances of police 'unlawfully using lethal force against a crowd' in Bihar's Siwan district; no one was killed.
Delhi Police said they used force only after protesters 'resorted to violence,' calling protesters 'anti-social elements masquerading as aggrieved students.'
On Friday, opposition leader Rahul Gandhi staged a sit-in with a 19-year-old protester injured by pellets during the July demonstration.
Police later registered a case over the complaint.
The protests were led by the online Cockroach Janta Party.
The protests broadened into a wider movement over unemployment and opportunities for young people, and critics describe Prime Minister Narendra Modi's rule as increasingly authoritarian.
The protests proved the biggest challenge Modi has faced after winning a third term in 2024.
Framing: Headline highlights Rijiju's dismissive quote questioning injuries and his praise for police handling. — critical of the government's response while reporting the minister's defense
Facts Included:
Union minister Kiren Rijiju denied allegations of police brutality against students in Delhi protests over the NEET-UG paper leak.
Rijiju referred to the July 20 Parliament student march and said police should be praised for handling everything 'so peacefully'.
Rijiju said 'Kahan goli chali hai?' (where were shots fired?) and claimed no one died or broke a bone or was seriously injured.
Rijiju claimed several people tried to incite violence and that 'so many criminals infiltrated under the guise of students'.
Rijiju said 'not one lathi was used' and that police only acted when protesters began marching towards Parliament.
The article notes that a huge row erupted last month after police clashed with student protesters during a July 20 march to Parliament.
The article states that visuals showed police lathi-charging students and that allegations of pellet gun use emerged.
The article reports that Opposition leaders, including LoP Rahul Gandhi, alleged pellet gun use during the protest.
The article mentions that HT reported that at least a dozen RAF personnel were issued pellet guns on the morning of July 20, but the weapons were withdrawn after claims of use.
Five people said they were hit with pellets, and students regularly alleged tear gas use during the protest.
Rahul Gandhi showed a student with an eye injury and displayed a pellet gun, saying 'Government has said no pellet gun has been used. Haven't they said it? See this, this is a pellet gun…'
The article notes that on Monday, some Opposition leaders alleged that questions raised by parliamentarians are routinely disallowed or left unanswered.
Framing: Highlights Amnesty's accusation of excessive force against youth protesters. — The tone is neutral, reporting both Amnesty's and police's statements without explicit editorializing.
Facts Included:
Amnesty International said Indian police used excessive force, including electric shock devices and pellet guns, against youth-led protests.
The protests were against alleged NEET examination irregularities.
The protests forced the education minister to resign.
India's Supreme Court set up a panel on Thursday to investigate violence by police and demonstrators.
Demonstrations in New Delhi turned violent on July 20 when thousands of protesters attempted to march towards parliament.
Amnesty said it verified the use of 'pellet-firing shotguns, tear gas launchers, grenades, batons and electric shock devices against protesters' in Delhi and Bihar.
Amnesty said it verified two instances of police 'unlawfully using lethal force against a crowd' in Bihar's Siwan district; no one was killed.
Amnesty said there were 'isolated incidents of protesters throwing stones'.
Delhi Police said in a Supreme Court hearing that they had used force only after protesters 'resorted to violence'.
Delhi Police said 'anti-social elements masquerading as aggrieved students' caused 'grievous injuries' to security forces.
Opposition leader Rahul Gandhi staged a sit-in outside a Delhi police station with a 19-year-old protester who said he was injured by pellets.
The protests were led by the online Cockroach Janta Party.
The protests broadened into a wider movement over unemployment and opportunities for young people.
The protests proved to be the biggest challenge to Prime Minister Narendra Modi after winning a third term in 2024.
Framing: Headline emphasizes Amnesty International's accusation of excessive police force, using the word 'excessive' to frame police conduct negatively. — The tone is critical of police and sympathetic to protesters, using words like 'excessive force,' 'state-sanctioned violence,' and 'lent support.'
Facts Included:
Amnesty International has accused the Delhi Police of using excessive force during the July 20 protests over the NET-UG paper leak.
The protests, led by youth, turned violent and resulted in Union Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan's resignation.
Amnesty International verified witness testimony and visual evidence showing police used 'pellet-firing shotguns, tear gas launchers, grenades, batons and electric shock devices against protesters' in Delhi and Bihar.
Amnesty International called the police action 'state-sanctioned violence masked as crowd control.'
Amnesty International disputed the police claim that force was used only after protesters turned violent, citing two instances in Bihar's Siwan district where lethal force was allegedly used.
No one was killed in these incidents.
The Supreme Court constituted a panel on August 20 to investigate violence by both police and demonstrators.
Congress leader Rahul Gandhi staged a sit-in outside a Delhi police station on August 21 with a 19-year-old protester who claimed pellets injured him.
A case was registered after the protester's complaint.
The protests were led by the 'Cockroach Janta Party' (sic) and demanded the resignation of then education minister Dharmendra Pradhan and broader educational reforms.
Framing: The headline emphasizes the accusation by Amnesty International that police used excessive force. — The tone is neutral and factual, reporting the allegations and responses without explicit editorializing.
Facts Included:
Amnesty International said on Aug 24 that Indian police used excessive force, including electric shock devices and pellet guns, against youth protests that forced the education minister to resign in July.
The protests were triggered by the leak of the national medical entrance test and turned violent on July 20 in New Delhi when thousands of protesters attempted to march towards Parliament.
Amnesty said witness testimony and visual evidence confirmed the use of 'pellet-firing shotguns, tear gas launchers, grenades, batons and electric shock devices against protesters' in Delhi and Bihar.
Amnesty verified two instances of a police officer 'unlawfully using lethal force against a crowd' in Bihar's Siwan district.
No one was killed.
Amnesty said the weapons were deployed in a manner that breached international law and standards and domestic policing guidelines.
Amnesty noted isolated incidents of protesters throwing stones but called the heavy-handed response 'state-sanctioned violence masked as crowd control'.
Delhi Police said in a Supreme Court hearing they had used force only after protesters 'resorted to violence' and that anti-social elements 'masquerading as aggrieved students' caused 'grievous injuries' to security forces.
On Aug 21, opposition leader Rahul Gandhi staged a sit-in outside a Delhi police station with a 19-year-old protester who said he was injured by pellets.
Gandhi demanded a police investigation into the shooting, and officers later registered a case over the complaint.
The protests broadened from anger over exam irregularities into a wider movement over unemployment, opportunities for young people and what critics describe as Prime Minister Narendra Modi's increasingly authoritarian rule.
The protests proved to be the biggest challenge that Modi has faced after winning a third term in 2024.
Framing: Emphasizes Amnesty's accusation that police used excessive force during the protests. — Critical of police and sympathetic to protesters, though it includes the police rebuttal.
Facts Included:
Amnesty International said police used excessive force, including electric shock devices and pellet guns, against youth-led protests.
The protests forced Union Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan to resign last month.
Amnesty's report clashes with the police account that force was used only after protesters turned violent.
The Supreme Court set up a panel on Thursday (August 20, 2026) to investigate violence by both police and demonstrators.
Demonstrations in New Delhi, triggered by the leak of NET-UG paper, turned violent on July 20 when thousands of protesters attempted to march towards Parliament.
Amnesty said witness testimony and visual evidence verified the use of "pellet-firing shotguns, tear gas launchers, grenades, batons and electric shock devices against protesters" in Delhi and Bihar.
Amnesty verified two instances of a police officer "unlawfully using lethal force against a crowd" in Bihar's Siwan district; no one was killed.
Amnesty said "the weapons were deployed in a manner that breached international law and standards and domestic policing guidelines."
Amnesty noted "isolated incidents of protesters throwing stones" but said the "heavy-handed response was state-sanctioned violence masked as crowd control."
Delhi Police said in a Supreme Court hearing last week they used force only after protesters "resorted to violence."
Police said anti-social elements "masquerading as aggrieved students" caused "grievous injuries" to security forces.
On Friday (August 21, 2026), Congress leader Rahul Gandhi staged a sit-in outside a Delhi police station with a 19-year-old protester who said he was injured by pellets.
Mr. Gandhi demanded a police investigation into the shooting, and officers later registered a case over the complaint.
AI-extracted; can misattribute a claim — see Methodology.
Each row is one claim, attributed to the outlet whose wording states it most clearly. Confidence rates how directly the source text states the claim — explicit and unhedged rates high; hedged, pieced-together, or internally inconsistent statements rate lower. It does not measure whether the claim is true. Status is Contested when two claims on this page negate each other; otherwise it counts the distinct outlets we found asserting it — so a single-source claim can still show high confidence, and a multi-source claim can show medium. Every one of those outlets is named beside the status, so you can check the count against the list. For claims extracted before we began storing that list, the row says so: it names the outlet the claim is quoted from and states that we have not recorded which outlets backed it. Outlets wrote at different times, so a figure that evolves — a casualty count, for example — can legitimately differ between rows; check the "as of" time next to each claim's source.
Claim
Confidence
Status
ClaimAmnesty International released a report on August 24, 2026, alleging that Indian police used excessive force, including pellet-firing shotguns, tear gas launchers, grenades, batons, and electric shock devices, against youth-led Cockroach protesters during the July 2026 protests in Delhi and Bihar.
ClaimAmnesty International verified two instances of a police officer using an AK-type assault rifle against protesters in Siwan, Bihar on July 24, 2026.
ClaimBihar Police agreed that the AK-47 rifle is a 'platoon-level weapon' used in special operations, not for crowd control, but denied using excessive force.
ClaimAakar Patel, Chair of Amnesty International India, said in a statement that the police response was 'state-sanctioned violence masked as crowd control'.
ClaimThe protests were led by the Cockroach Janta Party (CJP) and were sparked by the leak of question papers for a national medical college entrance exam.
ClaimAmnesty International published an account of an anonymous protester who claimed to have sustained pellet injuries, and said doctors confirmed the injuries were pellet injuries.
ClaimOn August 21, 2026, Rahul Gandhi staged a sit-in outside a Delhi police station with a 19-year-old protester who said he was wounded by pellets, and a case was subsequently registered.
ClaimIndian Foreign Minister S Jaishankar visited Russia, co-chairing the 27th Session of the India-Russia Inter-Governmental Commission on Trade, Economic, Scientific, Technological and Cultural Cooperation.
ClaimThe Supreme Court of India constituted a panel on August 20, 2026, to investigate allegations of violence by both police and demonstrators during the protests.
ClaimThe protests broadened into a wider movement over unemployment, opportunities for young people, and what critics describe as Prime Minister Narendra Modi's increasingly authoritarian rule.
ClaimSimilar demonstrations occurred in other states, including Karnataka, where a BJP-linked student body protested near the chief minister's residence.
ClaimCJP founder Abhijeet Dipke claimed that two protesters, Sahil and Vikas, were hit by pellets fired by police while protesting peacefully on July 20.
ClaimA general diary entry at Parliament Street police station shows that on July 20, on orders of DCP North Raja Bhatiya, 55 Non Electrical shells, 15 Electrical shells, 5 Tear Smoke Grenades, and ARG with 2 BC and 2 PP were used.
ClaimAmnesty's Evidence Lab verified two videos showing a Rapid Action Force officer firing a shotgun into the crowd at Connaught Place and Parliament Street.
ClaimAn internal inquiry by India's paramilitary forces reportedly found that personnel had fired at least seven rounds of ammunition containing metal pellets.
ClaimRahul Gandhi argued that either Home Minister Amit Shah ordered the use of lethal weapons, making him guilty, or he was unaware, making him incompetent.
ClaimAs reported by Hindustan Times, at least a dozen RAF personnel were issued pellet guns on the morning of July 20, but the arms were withdrawn after claims of use.
ClaimThe opposition demanded a statement from Union Home Minister Amit Shah regarding the alleged use of lathis, tear gas, shock batons, and pellet guns against protesters.
ClaimRahul Gandhi brought before the public a student who suffered injuries to his eye, saying 'this is a pellet gun… his eye has been damaged, he has lost his vision'.
ClaimOn July 20, thousands of protesters had all but shut down New Delhi, blocking off Parliament Street, demanding the resignation of then-Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan.
ClaimThe Delhi Police refused to register Sahil Lochab's complaint initially, and Rahul Gandhi staged a seven-hour sit-in outside the office of the Delhi Police chief.