GoldBod CEO vs Minority Leader: The $1.7bn Loss Dispute

The Minority in Ghana's Parliament, led by Alexander Afenyo-Markin, has challenged the Ghana Gold Board (GoldBod) to account for losses it alleges the state-owned gold-buying entity incurred through its gold trading operations in 2025. The Minority's demand, based on an International Monetary Fund (IMF) report, puts the losses at over $1.7 billion, a figure GoldBod's CEO Sammy Gyamfi has categorically rejected.

The Minority's allegations

Speaking at a press conference in Accra on Tuesday, August 19, the Minority presented its case: the IMF report indicates the Bank of Ghana's Gold Purchase Programme recorded losses exceeding $1.7 billion (GH¢22 billion) in 2025. Afenyo-Markin questioned why GoldBod should take credit for forex gains while shifting losses to the central bank.

He demanded answers on off-takers, discounted sales, and fee arrangements, arguing that GoldBod took the Bank of Ghana's money to assay gold and collect fees while pushing the risks and losses onto the central bank.

"You cannot claim the upside of a trade and disown its downsides," Afenyo-Markin said, according to the Minority's account of the exchange. "This arrangement separates benefits from risks, leaving the central bank and, ultimately, the taxpayer, to bear the losses."

Afenyo-Markin also noted that the Bank of Ghana's equity was negative GH¢93.8 billion at the end of last year, describing the central bank's position as "technical bankruptcy," a phrase the Minority has used repeatedly in recent months. He called on GoldBod to account for off-takers, discounted sales, and fee arrangements tied to its operations.

The Minority Leader also expressed readiness to submit to any investigation by the Police and the Office of the Special Prosecutor, saying he had nothing to hide.


GoldBod's response: CEO rejects claims

GoldBod CEO Sammy Gyamfi rejected the claims, saying the company's audited accounts show it recorded an operational surplus of GHC574 million in 2025 and not a loss.

"We have said this over and over: GoldBod did not make a loss in 2025. In fact, we recorded an operational surplus of GHC574 million," Gyamfi said at a press conference on Wednesday, August 19.

He said the IMF's report on Ghana's economy attributed the loss to the "scaling up" of the gold purchase programme, adding that the 2024 loss of $400 million was incurred by the Bank of Ghana (BoG) and not GoldBod.

"In 2024, the Bank of Ghana bought gold through PMs and the loss was recorded by BoG. GoldBod did not exist in 2024." He said.

Gyanfi also dared Afenyo-Markin to sue him over his "extortion" comment, saying he was "ready to settle it in court" and described the Minority Leader's claims as "crass ignorance, disingenuous accounting, and deliberate misrepresentation of facts".

He added that the paid-out sums for assays, fees under the arrangement constituted less than 1% of the reported loss.


Auditor-General's report: no adverse findings

According to Gyamfi, the Auditor-General's report contained "no adverse findings" against the board, and the IMF report indicates the 2024 loss was not GoldBod's responsibility because the company did not exist in 2024. He noted that the 2024 loss of $400 million occurred when the Bank was using PMMC and other buying agents, before GoldBod was set up.

"Not a single adverse finding was made by the Auditor-General in his 2025 report on GoldBod. The IMF report also cannot be blamed on GoldBod because foreign exchange losses are driven by the cedi's depreciation against major currencies, particularly the dollar." Gyamfi said.

He dismissed Afenyo-Markin's claims as "disingenuous accounting," and challenged him to provide evidence for his assertions. He also said he was ready to face any investigative body, including parliament, to defend the company's record.

The Ghana Stock Exchange listed GoldBod on its unlisted platform in 2024. Its annual reports are public documents.


Correction: This article was updated on August 26, 2025 to reflect that Afenyo-Markin addressed the House during the recall of Parliament, not at an earlier sitting.

*This article was produced with research support from a technology company."