Lead

The Munich Regional Court ruled on Friday that Suno AI, a US-based company that generates songs from text prompts, violated copyrights and must disclose illicit revenues and pay damages. The decision comes in a lawsuit initiated in January 2025 by GEMA, Germany's state-mandated licensing agency, which argued that Suno trained its AI models on copyrighted music without obtaining licences or compensating rights holders.

Coverage Comparison

Deutsche Welle reported that GEMA represents over 95,000 composers, songwriters, and music publishers in Germany. The same outlet noted that Suno AI generates 7 million tracks per day, and that around 75,000 tracks generated by Suno end up on streaming services daily. Both reports emphasize the case's significance as one of the first major tests of how traditional copyright law applies to AI music training and AI-generated outputs.

Key Claims

  • GEMA represents over 95,000 composers, songwriters, and music publishers in Germany.
  • Suno AI trained its AI models on copyrighted music without obtaining licences or compensating rights holders, as argued by GEMA.
  • Suno AI generates 7 million tracks per day, and about 75,000 of those tracks end up on streaming services daily.
  • The Munich Regional Court ruled that Suno violated copyrights and must disclose illicit revenues; damages have yet to be quantified.
  • Sunu has disagreed with the ruling and said it would evaluate all available options, including an appeal.

Perspectives

GEMA: GEMA CEO Tobias Holzmüller described the verdict as "of global significance." He emphasized that GEMA's goal is "not to clear Suno from the face of the earth" but to reach licensing negotiations on an eye-to-eye level. He characterized Suno as "by far the largest and commercially most successful of all AI music models" and said it pursues "a much more aggressive business strategy as compared to others."

Suno AI: Suno has disagreed with the ruling and said it would evaluate all available options, including an appeal. Among its arguments was that the German court does not have proper jurisdiction to rule on AI model training activities that occurred exclusively inside the United States.

Related Context

Last year, GEMA won a related case against OpenAI before the same court. The court found that OpenAI unlawfully trained its AI models on copyrighted song lyrics and reproduced them via ChatGPT without authorization.