Lead
Marine Le Pen, the leader of France's far-right National Rally party, has launched her presidential campaign after a court of appeal upheld her conviction for embezzling European Parliament funds but shortened her ban on running for office, opening a potential path to the 2027 presidential race. The court also handed her a three-year jail term with two years suspended, requiring her to wear an electronic ankle tag for one year, a condition that could complicate her campaign. Le Pen has said she will appeal to France's highest court, which would put her sentence on hold.
Coverage Comparison
Multiple reports from The Guardian's World desk have tracked the legal saga and its political fallout. Coverage of the court's decision on Tuesday emphasized the upholding of Le Pen's conviction and the reduction of her ban from running for office to 15 months, with the remaining 30 months suspended. A separate piece highlighted Le Pen's launch of her presidential campaign despite the conviction, noting that she would appeal to the Court of Cassation on a point of law, which would suspend her sentence. Another article focused on how the ruling will determine her eligibility for the 2027 election, with her party's popularity rising in the polls. Additionally, voter reactions from a small French town depicted a mixed response, with some supporters believing the conviction will not affect her chances while others express concerns about its impact on her campaign.
Key Claims
- Le Pen's conviction for embezzling European Parliament funds was upheld on appeal, but her ban on running for office was shortened to 15 months with the remaining 30 months suspended.
- She was given a three-year jail term, with two years suspended and one year with an electronic ankle tag, and a fine of €100,000 (£85,000).
- Le Pen's party, National Rally, was involved in a fake-jobs scam that diverted more than €2.8 million in European Parliament funds to pay party staff in Paris between 2004 and 2016, with the total loss to EU funds estimated at €4.8 million.
- Le Pen launched her presidential campaign despite the conviction, stating that she is a citizen using her rights.
- She will appeal to France's highest court, which will put her sentence on hold while she campaigns.
- Voter reactions are mixed, with some believing the conviction will not affect her chances, while others are concerned about the legal issues.
Context
The legal case stems from a scheme that ran from 2004 to 2016, involving 24 former MEPs and assistants, that used European Parliament funds to employ National Rally staff in France. The lower court's verdict in March 2025 had imposed a five-year ban and a four-year sentence, with two years suspended. Le Pen and others appealed, denying any systemic wrongdoing, claiming "good faith" and describing the case as a "witch-hunt." The appeal court's decision has now revived her bid for the presidency, though the prospect of wearing an electronic tag had previously led Le Pen to hint she might not run under such conditions.
Perspectives
Supporters: Some voters, like Jean-Antoine in Montargis, remain supportive, arguing that Le Pen did not personally profit from the funds and that all politicians are schemers. They believe the legal woes will not dampen her support.
Critics: Leftwing protesters at her walkabout in La Flèche shouted "thief" and "criminal," and some voters are concerned about the conviction's effect on her campaign, potentially undermining her credibility.
Le Pen's Team: Le Pen and her allies, including party president Jordan Bardella, who would be a replacement candidate if she were unable to run, have downplayed the conviction, with Le Pen stating she is prepared for any event and will run if she can campaign freely.
Court's Position: The court, in its ruling, upheld her conviction and sentence but shortened her ban, indicating a nuanced legal approach that balances accountability with due process.
Le Pen's Political Strategy: Le Pen is framing the legal case as a "witch hunt" and has vowed to continue her campaign, appealing to the highest court to suspend the sentence, potentially avoiding the restrictions of the electronic tag during the campaign.