Lead

Britain's financial regulator has been urged to consider regulation of large language models such as ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini because of their growing influence on consumer financial decisions. In a review commissioned by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) and published on Monday, the watchdog's executive director, Sheldon Mills, also highlighted how companies' reliance on a handful of technology providers introduces potential system-wide risks.

Ministers have been urged to toughen the City regulator's powers to protect consumers against the potential risks of AI, according to the landmark Mills review, which looked at how AI will reshape financial services from 2030 onward.

Coverage Comparison

The Guardian reported on the call for ministers to toughen the FCA's powers, emphasizing the potential risks to consumers. The Hindu highlighted the urging of the regulator to consider regulation of large language models, noting both the risks and benefits. Both outlets covered the core findings, with the Guardian focusing on consumer protection and the Hindu placing the review in a global context of AI adoption.

Key Claims

  • The FCA found that a fifth of people across the UK, equivalent to 11 million people, are open to using AI to make their financial decisions.
  • More than a quarter of UK consumers trust tools such as OpenAI's ChatGPT, Anthropic's Claude, and Google's Gemini for financial advice, with only limited awareness that protections applied to regulated financial services do not extend to those AI services.
  • Financial advice is a regulated activity that can only be provided by authorised businesses, so AI should not offer more than generic financial guidance. However, Mills said that personal recommendations by a chatbot could blur the boundary, and continuous and adaptive recommendations may start to look like regulated advice.
  • The FCA said it was the first regulator globally to study the impact of AI on financial services.
  • The review recommends that the FCA launch another review within the next six months, looking at the potential harm facing consumers who are using AI to manage their personal finances.
  • 81% of financial firms globally were adopting AI at some level, with 40% at more advanced stages.

Perspectives

Regulator's View

The FCA, through the Mills review, acknowledges that AI has the potential to improve access, personalisation, and efficiency in financial services, but also warns that it could amplify risks associated with fraud, cybersecurity, consumer harm, and market concentration. The review sets out a roadmap for how industry regulators and government can prepare for the next phase of AI-driven change.

Industry Legal Perspective

Jonathan Herbst, global head of financial services at law firm Norton Rose Fulbright, said Mills was not proposing an immediate crackdown but was asking whether the rules need to evolve to reflect how financial services are changing with AI.