Coverage Overview
Russian Security Council Secretary Sergey Shoigu has asserted that the military experience Russia has gained during its ongoing special military operation is attracting genuine interest worldwide, and that no other army can match Russia's level of preparedness and equipment. His comments, reported by the Russian state news agency TASS, were made at two separate security-related events in late May.
The first set of remarks came on May 26, following a meeting of the Committee of Secretaries of the Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO) Security Councils. Speaking to reporters, Shoigu emphasized that the experience was not limited to Russia's CSTO partners but had global relevance. The second occasion was the First International Security Forum held under the council's auspices, where Shoigu elaborated on the theme, according to TASS.
Key Claims
Shoigu's central claim is that the nature of military operations has changed dramatically in recent years, making Russia's battlefield experience valuable. "New risks and new threats emerge, and, naturally, warfare has changed," he said. "Therefore, practically everyone is interested in the experience that we have acquired."
He further stated that Russia possesses "perhaps the most extensive experience and the best specialists in this area today," and that new technologies have emerged that are essential for modern combat operations.
On the question of military capability, Shoigu made a strong assertion: "It will be fair to say that the experience of the Russian armed forces is priceless," and added, "I can think of no other army, which is as well-trained, well-prepared and well-equipped as Russia's."
Perspectives
These statements reflect the official Russian government position, as presented by TASS, which is known to align closely with Kremlin messaging. The coverage does not include external commentary or independent verification of Shoigu's claims about the superiority of Russia's military or the global demand for its experience. No other news outlets are cited in the provided material.
The claim that no other army can rival Russia's is presented without evidence or comparative data, and should be viewed as a political assertion rather than an objective assessment. The characterization of the conflict as a "special military operation" follows official Russian terminology, which differs from the terminology used by many other countries and international bodies.
As with any statements from government officials, readers should consider the broader context of Russia's ongoing military campaign in Ukraine and the international community's response, including sanctions and diplomatic isolation. Shoigu's remarks appear aimed at projecting strength and influence, particularly among allied nations within the CSTO framework.