Tertius News is an AI-native newsroom: an AI model reads the linked source articles below and extracts what each outlet reported, so you can compare their coverage side by side. How this works →
'Enough Material To Show...': SC Overturns NGT Order Against Art of Living, Directs Rs 5 Crore As Fine
The Supreme Court has set aside a 2017 National Green Tribunal order that held the Art of Living Foundation responsible for damaging the Yamuna floodplains during the 2016 World Culture Festival, directing the Delhi Development Authority to refund the Rs 5 crore deposit within four weeks. The court found insufficient evidence of environmental damage caused by the event and criticized the DDA for permitting the event on an active floodplain.
The Supreme Court has quashed a 2017 National Green Tribunal (NGT) order that held the Art of Living Foundation liable for environmental damage to the Yamuna floodplains during its 2016 World Culture Festival. The court also directed the Delhi Development Authority (DDA) to refund the Rs 5 crore deposit made by the organisation within four weeks, invalidating all consequential and interim actions taken against it.
The bench, comprising Justices Satish Chandra Sharma and NK Singh, ruled that the material on record did not prove that the festival caused damage to the site. According to Times Now, the court found "ample material" showing the event site was already in a dilapidated condition before it was handed over to the organisers. ThePrint reported that the court also held that the NGT relied too heavily on an expert committee's report, which used unclear photographs and a single Google Earth image.
Background of the Dispute
The World Culture Festival was organised by the Art of Living Foundation (through Vyakti Vikas Kendra India) on 25 hectares of the Yamuna floodplains in Delhi in March 2016. In February that year, environmental activist Manoj Misra moved the NGT, arguing that large-scale preparations would harm the ecological balance of the river and its adjoining wetlands.
The NGT appointed an expert committee that submitted reports concluding the floodplains were "severely damaged." A third report in November 2016 proposed a Rs 42-crore rehabilitation plan over 10 years. Based on these findings, the NGT held the organisers liable under the principle of "no-fault liability" and directed the deposit.
Court's Reasoning
The Supreme Court rejected the NGT's application of "no-fault liability" and the "polluter pays" principle, distinguishing between rehabilitation and restoration. ThePrint reported that the court said the tribunal got swayed by the committee's report without examining contemporaneous evidence. The court also criticised the DDA for granting permission to hold the event on an active floodplain, stating that the authority failed in its duties towards the public.
Directions and Reactions
The court directed the DDA to refund the Rs 5 crore deposit within four weeks and affirmed that the DDA remains responsible for ongoing rehabilitation work as per the tribunal's plan.
In a statement, the Art of Living welcomed the verdict, saying it brought closure to a "decade-long media trial and false allegations." The organisation's release noted that the festival had participation from over 155 countries and 3.5 million attendees, and was chaired by former Chief Justice of India R C Lahoti. The late Dr. Boutros Boutros-Ghali, former UN Secretary-General, was to co-chair the event but passed away a month before.
An official spokesperson said the "ridiculous attitude of certain vested interests" in falsely accusing the organisation had been exposed.
How each outlet told it
ANI (Asian News International)
Framing: Highlights Art of Living's welcome of the verdict, emphasizing the quashing of the NGT order. It leaves out the court's criticism of DDA and the specifics of the legal reasoning. — Celebratory and vindicated - 'the ruling brought closure to a decade-long media trial and false allegations.'
Facts Included:
The Supreme Court set aside a 2017 NGT order that held Art of Living responsible for damaging Yamuna floodplains during the 2016 World Culture Festival.
The court directed the DDA to refund the Rs 5 crore deposit within four weeks.
The court invalidated all consequential and interim actions.
Justice Satish Chandra Sharma noted in the judgment that the material on record failed to prove environmental damage.
Art of Living released a statement welcoming the verdict and referring to a 'decade-long media trial and false allegations.'
The World Culture Festival had participation from over 155 countries and 3.5 million attendees.
The event was chaired by former Chief Justice of India R C Lahoti.
The late Dr. Boutros Boutros-Ghali was to co-chair the event but passed away a month before.
An official spokesperson said the 'ridiculous attitude of certain vested interests' was exposed.
The court directed DDA to continue rehabilitation work as per the tribunal's plan.
The court did not alter DDA's responsibilities regarding floodplain management.
Framing: Emphasizes the Supreme Court's closure of the case and its order for a refund. It leaves out the criticism of the NGT and the underlying environmental concerns. — Analytical and legalistic - 'the court also pointed out that the photographs used in the expert committee’s report were unclear.'
Facts Included:
The World Culture Festival was organized by Art of Living Foundation on 25 hectares of Yamuna floodplains in March 2016.
Environmental activist Manoj Misra moved the NGT in February 2016.
An expert committee was appointed and submitted reports, concluding the floodplains were 'severely damaged'.
A third report in November 2016 proposed a Rs 42-crore rehabilitation plan over 10 years.
The NGT held organizers liable under 'no-fault liability'.
The organizers appealed to the Supreme Court.
The court ruled the NGT relied too heavily on the committee's claim and that the report used unclear photographs and a single Google Earth image.
The court distinguished between rehabilitation and restoration.
The court rejected NGT's application of 'no-fault liability' and 'polluter pays' principle.
The court directed the Rs 5 crore deposit to be refunded within four weeks.
The DDA remains solely responsible for ongoing rehabilitation of the floodplains.
Framing: Uses the phrase 'Enough Material To Show...' to emphasize the court's finding that the site was already damaged. The headline calls the Rs 5 crore a 'fine' in quotes, which is misleading as the court ordered a refund. — Critical of the NGT and DDA - 'the court slammed the DDA for granting permission...'
Facts Included:
The Supreme Court overturned the 2017 NGT ruling against Art of Living Foundation.
The court held there was 'ample material' showing the site was already in a dilapidated condition before the event.
The court directed the DDA to refund the Rs 5 crore environmental compensation.
The event was held from March 11 to 13, 2016, on 25 hectares upstream of the DND flyway.
The bench comprised Justices Satish Chandra Sharma and NK Singh.
The appeal was filed by Vyakti Vikas Kendra India.
The court said the tribunal got swayed by the expert committee's report without examining contemporaneous evidence.
The court slammed the DDA for granting permission to hold the event on an active floodplain.
The court directed DDA to continue rehabilitation work as directed by NGT.
The court said the DDA failed in its duties towards the public.
Each row is one claim, attributed to the outlet whose wording states it most clearly. Confidence rates how directly the source text states the claim — explicit and unhedged rates high; hedged, pieced-together, or internally inconsistent statements rate lower. It does not measure whether the claim is true. Status counts the distinct outlets we found asserting it — so a single-source claim can still show high confidence, and a multi-source claim can show medium. Every one of those outlets is named beside the status, so you can check the count against the list. For claims extracted before we began storing that list, the row says so: it names the outlet the claim is quoted from and states that we have not recorded which outlets backed it. Outlets wrote at different times, so a figure that evolves — a casualty count, for example — can legitimately differ between rows; check the "as of" time next to each claim's source.
Claim
Confidence
Status
ClaimThe Supreme Court set aside a 2017 National Green Tribunal order that held the Art of Living Foundation responsible for damaging the Yamuna floodplains during its 2016 World Culture Festival.
ClaimThe Supreme Court directed the Delhi Development Authority (DDA) to refund the Rs 5 crore deposit made by the Art of Living Foundation within four weeks.
ClaimThe Supreme Court ruled that the NGT relied too heavily on the expert committee's report and that the report used unclear photographs and a single Google Earth image.
ClaimThe Supreme Court rejected the NGT's application of both 'no-fault liability' and the 'polluter pays' principle against the Art of Living Foundation.
ClaimThe Supreme Court affirmed that the DDA remains solely responsible for the ongoing rehabilitation and ecological management of the Yamuna floodplains.