CPI general secretary says deputy leader demand genuine
CPI general secretary D. Raja on Monday (August 24, 2026) described his party's demand for the Deputy Leader of Opposition post in the Kerala Assembly as 'genuine' and urged CPI(M) leader Pinarayi Vijayan to be 'more accommodating' on the issue. Raja was responding to reporters' questions on Vijayan's recent remarks that if required, only a CPI(M) leader would be appointed as Deputy Leader of the Opposition, despite the CPI's claim for the post. Vijayan serves as the Leader of the Opposition in the Kerala Assembly.
"As far as our party is concerned, the demand for Deputy Leader is a genuine one. The CPI has been demanding this, and it was being discussed bilaterally," Raja said.
Raja said he 'did not understand' why Vijayan made remarks in favour of a CPI(M) leader for the post. "Comrade Pinarayi Vijayan, being a senior leader of the entire Left movement in India, must be more accommodating, and that can further strengthen the LDF," he said.
Recently, CPI State secretary Binoy Viswam also expressed concern over Vijayan's remarks and reiterated the party's demand for the post.
The CPI is the second-largest constituent of the Left Democratic Front (LDF) after the CPI(M), which leads the Left bloc.
Janayugom editorial-page article attacks Vijayan
Meanwhile, the CPI mouthpiece Janayugom has launched a sharp attack on Vijayan over his remarks on the appointment of the opposition deputy leader. In an editorial-page article, CPI assistant secretary Sathyan Mokeri said Vijayan's statement on the issue could only be viewed as a 'blatant violation of coalition etiquette' and a failure to uphold the ethics required in coalition politics.
A coalition is a political arrangement formed by multiple parties to pursue common political objectives, Mokeri said. "An attitude that says 'I'll decide, I'm everything' is not conducive to the collective functioning of a front. It is also withdrawing of a Communist leader," he added.
CPI had stakes claim for the post of opposition deputy leader as part of efforts to strengthen the collective functioning of the LDF following its defeat in the assembly elections. Mokeri alleged that Vijayan made his statement while CPI's proposal was still being discussed at various levels, effectively bypassing the ongoing discussions.
Deputy leader appointment a political matter, says CPI
Mokeri argued that the appointment of an opposition deputy leader is a political matter and cannot be decided unilaterally by the opposition leader. He also noted that the issue is before the national leadership of both parties.
Questioning Vijayan's reported decision to communicate his position through a letter, Mokeri pointed out that there had been no discussion on such a letter during CPI-CPM talks. "That prompted the LoP to say that he would write a letter? It is clear that the motivation is not Left politics," he alleged.
Mokeri also questioned whether announcing unilateral positions through a news conference, while discussions were under way with the understanding that disputes should not hamper the functioning of the LDF, would strengthen the front. "What is the LDF? What are the politics and ethics that the front upholds?" he asked.
The CPI's attack underscores the growing friction between the allies over the Deputy Leader post. The national leadership of both parties is reportedly handling the issue, but the public statements indicate the matter remains unresolved.
Perspectives
- D. Raja (CPI general secretary): The CPI's demand for the Deputy Leader of the Opposition post is genuine and was being discussed bilaterally. Pinarayi Vijayan, as a senior Left leader, should be more accommodating to strengthen the LDF.
- Pinarayi Vijayan (CPI(M) leader, LoP): (Position inferred from remarks) He has stated that if required, only a CPI(M) leader would be appointed as Deputy Leader of the Opposition.
- Sahayan Mokeri (CPI assistant secretary): Vijayan's statement is a blatant violation of coalition etiquette and demonstrates a unilateral attitude unbecoming of a Communist leader. He questions the motives behind Vijayan's communication, suggesting it is not in the interest of Left politics.