Board reverses course on Coming Street dorm
The College of Charleston can move forward with its proposed freshman residence hall on Coming Street, a city board decided—even though the exact contents of the ground beneath the site remain unknown.
The Board of Architectural Review voted unanimously on Aug. 31 to grant conceptual approval to Coming Street Commons, a 136,483-square-foot, four- to seven-story building with 608 beds. The vote reversed the board's earlier decision this summer, when it had asked the college to defer seeking conceptual approval until more information was gathered about what lies underground, as reported by the Charleston Post and Courier.
The college instead submitted a slightly altered design application, arguing the project should proceed in parallel with archaeological fact-finding. The board approved that application with conditions, according to the Post and Courier. Live 5 News WCSC also reported the board gave conceptual approval for the building, but not for the commemorative plan for the burial ground, and that approval came with conditions.
The site is the 18th-century Municipal Cemetery, believed to be the final resting place for thousands of people, including free and enslaved people of African descent, as well as the poor, orphans, and travelers, according to Live 5 News and the Post and Courier. Excavation could be the only way to determine if the historic integrity of the burial ground has been altered or destroyed by development after it reached capacity in 1807, the State Historic Preservation Office wrote in January, as reported by the Post and Courier.
Community concerns and commemorative changes
The proposalhas drawn concern from preservation advocates and community members. Anna Catherine Alexander, director of advocacy initiatives for the Preservation Society of Charleston, told Live 5 News the community has an obligation to investigate and protect history below the surface, given recent archaeological findings across the peninsula.
Millicent Brown, a member of the Community Engagement Council and the Protect and Respect the Bodies Coalition, expressed concern about historical erasure,as reported by Live 5 News.
Nearly 30 people submitted public comments requesting the board uphold its July decision, according to the Post and Courier. WiBi Ashley wrote, "We have a responsibility to listen to what the land is telling us and to honor those who came before us. Let the ground speak first." Three people submitted comments in favor of the project advancing, the Post and Courier reported.
The college updated its application to address some concerns, dropping a proposed grab-and-go café and adding more commemorative and educational space, including a public gallery and student learning facility, according to Live 5 News. The Post and Courier also reported the removal of the grab-and-go, with a public gallery and student learning facility proposed in its place.
College officials defend plan
College of Charleston President Andrew T. Hsu told Live 5 News, "We believe we can honor the history of this site, treat it past with the dignity it deserves,and at the same time create housing that serves our students and strengthens the surrounding community." The Post and Courier quoted Hsu saying, "The plan is thoughtful, appropriate to the setting and worthy of moving forward," and "We are committed to treating any remains with the dignity and the respect that they deserve."
Jay White of Liollio Architecture, the firm working on the project, said the plan is "framed around mitigation and stewardship," according to the Post and Courier.
The updated application includes an archaeological work plan developed in May, the Post and Courier reported. Archaeologists must determine what remains are present before the college and Liollio Architecture can submit a separate application for the design of the commemorative space, and the board said both the commemorative space design and the rest of the building must be finalized before a construction permit can be issued, according to the Post and Courier.
There is no clear timeline for results of the archaeological study of the burial ground, Live 5 News reported, raising concerns among some community members.