Lead
British Steel has formally been taken into public ownership, 15 months after the UK government stepped in to prevent the closure of its steelworks in Scunthorpe and the loss of 4,000 jobs. The move has drawn a sharp rebuke from China's government, which says it is "strongly dissatisfied" with the decision.
The nationalisation follows the Steel Industry (Nationalisation) Act receiving Royal Assent on Wednesday, with Prime Minister Keir Starmer saying it was in the national interest for the government to take over the factory from its Chinese owner, Jingye.
Coverage Comparison
The Guardian's reporting covers both the UK government's rationale for the takeover and China's reaction. One article focuses on the nationalisation itself, detailing the government's steps and the legal process, while another highlights Beijing's response, quoting China's Ministry of Commerce (Mofcom) as saying the move deals "a severe blow to Chinese companies' confidence in investing in the UK."
Both accounts note that the government stepped in with an emergency recall of parliament in April last year to prevent British Steel's closure, after Jingye threatened to walk away without taking steps to preserve the blast furnaces in Lincolnshire. The company has been under the management of government officials since then, to the fury of Jingye, but remained the economic owner until the expropriation on Thursday.
Key Claims
- China's Ministry of Commerce said the nationalisation deals "a severe blow to Chinese companies' confidence in investing in the UK." A Mofcom spokesperson told the Chinese media outlet Global Times: "The UK side, disregarding Jingye Group's important contributions to the British economy and society, forcibly took control of British Steel and subsequently nationalised the company in the name of national security, seriously undermining Jingye's legitimate rights and interests and dealing a severe blow to Chinese companies' confidence in investing in the UK."
- The UK government said the move was essential to maintain steel production at the company's site in Scunthorpe, Lincolnshire, to protect the company's future and UK supply chains. The Department for Business and Trade described the nationalisation as necessary to protect "the future of steel production."
- The government said that "despite extensive discussions," it could not reach a deal with Jingye that would "secure the future of the company while delivering value for taxpayers."
- The government will appoint an independent valuer to "assess whether any compensation is payable." Jingye has argued in its UK accounts and in statements on its WeChat social media account that British Steel was a valuable asset worthy of large compensation, even though it had been prepared to walk away and let it fail.
- Prime Minister Keir Starmer said: "British Steel is part of the fabric of our nation and a cornerstone of Britain's industrial strength. Today's decision secures the future of steel making in the UK, protects skilled jobs and safeguards a vital national capability. This government will always act in the national interest to support British industry, strengthen our economy and ensure the industries we rely on can thrive long into the future."
Perspectives
UK Government: The government maintains that the nationalisation was necessary to protect the future of steel production in the UK, safeguard skilled jobs, and preserve a vital national capability. It says it acted in the national interest after extensive discussions with Jingye failed to secure the company's future while delivering value for taxpayers.
China's Ministry of Commerce: Mofcom said the UK "forcibly took control" of British Steel and nationalised the company "in the name of national security," seriously undermining Jingye's legitimate rights and interests. It said China "firmly opposes and is strongly dissatisfied" with the decision, and will support Chinese companies in safeguarding their rights through legal means while taking strong measures to protect Chinese companies' interests.
Jingye: The former owner has argued in its UK accounts and on its WeChat account that British Steel was a valuable asset worthy of large compensation, despite having been prepared to walk away and let it fail.