Tertius News is an AI-native newsroom: an AI model reads the linked source articles below and extracts what each outlet reported, so you can compare their coverage side by side. How this works →
China missile test draws criticism from Australia, New Zealand, Japan
China test-launched a long-range ballistic missile from a nuclear-powered submarine in the South Pacific, drawing criticism from Australia, New Zealand, and Japan. The test, conducted within the South Pacific Nuclear Free Zone, was described by Beijing as routine, but regional leaders called it destabilizing.
Lead
China test-launched a long-range ballistic missile from a nuclear-powered submarine in the South Pacific on Monday, a move that drew criticism from Australia, New Zealand, and Japan. The missile was fired at 12:01pm local time and landed in designated waters, according to China's official Xinhua News Agency. Beijing described the test as a routine arrangement of its annual military training, stating it was not directed at any specific country or target.
Coverage Comparison
Coverage of the event varied in emphasis. Al Jazeera highlighted the regional concerns, noting that Japan, Australia, and New Zealand criticized the launch. Deutsche Welle focused on what it described as "condemnation" from regional powers, emphasizing Australia's accusation that Beijing was "destabilizing" the region. France 24 reported on the protest and concerns from Australia and New Zealand, while the South China Morning Post provided details on the timing and the notification of relevant countries, noting this was China's first known submarine-based missile test since 1982.
Key Claims
- China test-launched a long-range ballistic missile from a nuclear-powered submarine in the South Pacific. This was reported by Al Jazeera, Deutsche Welle, France 24, and the South China Morning Post.
- The launch was part of routine annual training, as stated by Xinhua and reported by France 24 and Al Jazeera.
- The missile was fired into the South Pacific Nuclear Free Zone, established by the 1986 Treaty of Rarotonga. This was noted by Deutsche Welle and France 24.
- Australia and New Zealand criticized the launch, with Australia's Foreign Minister Penny Wong calling it "destabilizing" and New Zealand's Foreign Minister Winston Peters expressing concern. This was reported by Al Jazeera, Deutsche Welle, and France 24.
- China ratified the protocols of the 1986 Treaty of Rarotonga in 1987, pledging not to test nuclear weapons within the zone. This was mentioned by France 24 and Deutsche Welle.
- The test was China's first known submarine-based missile test since 1982, according to the South China Morning Post.
- Relevant countries were notified ahead of time, including Japan, Australia, New Zealand, and Papua New Guinea, as reported by the South China Morning Post and Al Jazeera.
- Australia accused Beijing of "destabilizing" the region, as reported by Deutsche Welle and Al Jazeera.
Perspectives
Australia
Australia's Foreign Minister Penny Wong called the test "destabilising" to the region, stating that Australia had been clear with China about its concerns. She made the remarks while in Fiji, where Australia and Fiji signed a mutual defense treaty aimed at countering Chinese influence in the Pacific.
New Zealand
New Zealand's Foreign Minister Winston Peters said the test was an "unwelcome and concerning development," noting that despite long-standing concerns, China carried out the test within hours of informing Wellington. He also pointed out that the missile was fired into the South Pacific Nuclear Free Zone.
Japan
Japan's government expressed "grave concern" over the Chinese military's increased activity and confirmed it had been notified of the launch. Tokyo urged China to reconsider, and its coastguard had been alerted about falling space debris that could fall within Japan's exclusive economic zone.
China
China's official Xinhua News Agency described the test as a "routine arrangement" of annual military training, stating it was not directed at any specific country or target. Beijing maintained that the test complied with international law and practice.