Lead

The National Assembly has approved 135 demands for grants for the next fiscal year 2026-27, wrapping up the budgetary allocations for federal ministries and allied departments. The approval process, spread over two days, saw the opposition move 587 cut motions—including 380 on Monday—all of which were rejected by majority vote, as reported by Dawn.

Coverage Comparison

Dawn reported that the interior ministry came under heavy fire from opposition lawmakers, who criticised its performance and that of its attached departments, including the Federal Investigation Agency, the Anti-Narcotics Force, and the National Cybercrime Investigation Agency. Separately, Dawn covered the budget debate in the lower house, highlighting heated exchanges that degenerated into name-calling and near-brawls.

Key Claims

  • The National Assembly approved 135 demands for grants for fiscal year 2026-27.
  • The opposition moved 587 cut motions over two days, all of which were rejected by majority vote.
  • Opposition lawmakers slammed the interior ministry for poor performance, attributing to it a range of problems including economic damage and social polarisation.
  • PTI MNA Shandana Gulzar criticised the registration of cybercrime cases over political criticism, alleging that the National Cybercrime Investigation Agency was charging people for criticising politicians.
  • Finance Minister Muhammad Aurangzeb was set to deliver the winding-up speech as the general debate on the federal budget was expected to conclude, in line with its pre-set 40-hour duration.
  • Spats between ruling and opposition lawmakers degenerated into name-calling, with an incident between Food Minister Rana Tanvir and PTI leader Amir Dogar nearly escalating to a brawl.
  • The PPP defended allocations for the Benazir Income Support Programme (BISP) and demanded more funds for agriculture.

Budget Approval Process

The approval process was completed over two days, with the house expected to take up the finance bill and related fiscal measures before the budget is passed. According to Dawn, the National Assembly TV and its social media channels continued airing opposition speeches in a censored manner, muting sentences related to Imran Khan and criticism of state institutions.

Interior Ministry Under Fire

A total of 123 cut motions were submitted regarding the interior ministry. Opposition lawmakers said they moved the highest number of cut motions for this ministry to highlight problems faced by the general public. PTI MNA Shandana Gulzar said Pakistan lacked investments due to the law and order situation, while online hate speech continued to polarise society along ethnic and religious lines. She stated: "The failure of just one ministry has not only destroyed the economy of the country but also divided the society," adding that citizens were being killed by terrorists, criminals, and even law enforcers.

Heated Debate in the House

The session commenced with a heated debate just short of a brawl between Food Minister Rana Tanvir and PTI leader Amir Dogar. During his speech, Dogar made derogatory comments towards the ruling party lawmaker with a smirk. Tanvir responded harshly, saying, "I even knew your father—I know who you people are," which invited the ire of other PTI members. Atif Khan moved towards Tanvir, criticising the minister for involving families in the political debate. The situation escalated as both sides used "harsh language," with the speaker asking State Minister for Interior Senator Tallal Chaudhary, who was present, to intervene.

What's Next

The finance minister is set to deliver the winding-up speech, with cut motions to follow. One day each is allocated for the passage of the finance bill and the supplementary grants in the outgoing fiscal year. The general discussion, initially scheduled until June 19, was cut short by two days to wrap up the budget by June 24 before the Ashura holidays.

Perspectives

Government/Opposition Dynamics

The ruling coalition and opposition clashed over the interior ministry's performance and broader budgetary priorities, with heated exchanges escalating to personal insults. The opposition criticised the government's handling of law and order, while the government defended its allocations, including for BISP.

PPP Stance

The PPP defended BISP allocations and demanded more funds for agriculture, indicating a point of contention even within the ruling coalition's broader support base, as reported by Dawn.