A Brooklyn judge on Monday declined to halt a vote on proposed rule changes to the Brooklyn Democratic Party's executive committee, allowing Tuesday's meeting to move forward while leaving the broader legal questions unresolved.

Justice Jill Epstein of the state Supreme Court denied the reformers' emergency request for a temporary restraining order, writing that the request was "premature" and could be renewed after the meeting, according to court documents. The decision came after the case was reassigned following the recusal of the first judge, Justice Kenneth P. Sherman, who wrote that he "may be seeking re-nomination in the next election cycle" and that his nomination could be affected by the case, creating "at a minimum" the appearance of impropriety.

The lawsuit, filed Monday morning by Julio Peña III and three other district leaders—Akel Williams, Jillian Cara Goger and Johnny Sagan—challenges the authority of the current executive committee to adopt sweeping changes to party rules in the window between June's primary and the newly elected County Committee's organizational meeting this fall. The group claims it holds 22 of the party's 42 district leader seats.

The proposed amendments, unveiled by Party Chair Rodneyse Bichotte Hermelyn, would add more than two dozen new voting members to the executive committee, including eight countywide positions and a new delegate from each Assembly District. Additional changes would set the quorum at 25 members, give Assembly District committees 60 days instead of 30 to organize, and require an 85% vote for future rule changes involving proxies. Currently, voting is largely restricted to Brooklyn's elected State Committee members, commonly known as district leaders.

Mark Hanna, an attorney for the reformers, said the judge's reasoning was that the meeting could take place and the amendments could fail, leaving no harm for the court to undo. He said his clients intend to return to court if the amendments pass and seek a ruling on whether the current executive committee has the authority to adopt the changes and whether everyone expected to vote is legally entitled to do so.

The petition argues that "an outgoing party leadership should not rewrite the rules on the eve of the organizational meeting to change the electorate before that electorate has the opportunity to vote." It also challenges the eligibility of several individuals invited to participate, alleging they lost State Committee races in June or did not seek reelection. The filing names Anthony Beckford, Michelle Tege, Doug Schneider, Lydia Bella Green, Arleny Alvarado-McCalla, Heriberto Mateo, Kenesha Traynham-Cooper, Henry Butler, Michael Boomer, Mercedes Narcisse and Roxanne Persaud.

The vote is scheduled for Tuesday night at 6 p.m. at the Thomas Jefferson Democratic Club in Mill Basin, where members are expected to consider and adopt the proposed rule changes in a closed executive session, according to the notice.

The legal fight comes amid mounting opposition from prominent Democrats. Mayor Zohran Mamdani said he "very much" opposes the changes, calling them "an attempt to circumnavigate the will of voters." Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer issued a statement saying, "Respecting the outcome of elections is a bedrock principle of our democracy, and our Democratic Party must defend that principle. Given the clear results of the June Democratic primary in Brooklyn, the party should not change the rules in the middle of the game."

House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries and state Democratic Party Chair Jay Jacobs have also urged against the changes. Attorney General Letitia James and Public Advocate Jumaane Williams issued a joint statement saying, "New Yorkers deserve leaders who are committed to serving their communities, not rewriting rules to hold onto power. Changing the makeup of an executive committee on the eve of a leadership vote goes against what we believe in as Democrats and should not move forward."

Good-government groups Citizens Union and Common Cause New York also came out against the full package Monday, arguing in a joint memo that the proposals would rewrite the rules governing the chair election "in an apparent effort to reverse a result already reached at the ballot box" and make it harder for reformers to exercise the power they won in June.

Bichotte Hermelyn has defended the proposal, saying it would expand the executive committee to give more elected party members a voice in decisions. "This is not handpicked. This is not appointed," she said. She defended the timing, saying "We've always proposed rules ahead of the county committee organization." Asked whether the expansion was intended to stop Peña from taking control of the party, she replied: "Absolutely not." She said last week she had not decided whether to seek another term as chair.

The reformers, who are backing Peña—a longtime district leader from Sunset Park—for the next party chair, argue that the changes are designed to reshape the electorate before the newly elected reform district leaders take their seats. If the amendments pass Tuesday, the newly added voting members would be eligible to participate in the fall leadership election, potentially altering its outcome.