UK Court of Appeal Upholds Terrorism Ban on Palestine Action
Britain’s Court of Appeal has ruled that the government’s proscription of the activist group Palestine Action as a terrorist organisation was lawful, overturning a High Court decision from February. The ruling was delivered on Monday by a panel of five judges, including Lady Chief Justice Sue Carr.
In her remarks announcing the decision, Carr said the court had concluded that the proscription decision struck a fair balance and that the group’s behaviour was not that of a non-violent, direct-action organisation. “It is a fundamental mistake to overlook the fact that Palestine Action overtly promoted unlawful violence amounting to terrorism,” she added.
The government had appealed after the High Court ruled in February that the ban unlawfully interfered with freedom of expression. Lawyers for Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood had argued at a hearing in April that the conclusion that the ban had a significant impact on freedom of expression was “overstated and wrong”.
Palestine Action, which has targeted Israel-linked defence companies, particularly Elbit Systems, was proscribed under terrorism laws last year. The campaign has led to a wave of arrests, with more than 3,000 people having been arrested under the Terrorism Act since the ban was imposed, and more than 700 charged, according to reporting by The Guardian. Al Jazeera reported at least 1,600 arrests linked to support for Palestine Action.
Huda Ammori, co-founder of Palestine Action, said the ruling was disappointing but expressed confidence in eventual victory. She stated that the ban imposed “severe restrictions on the fundamental free speech and assembly rights of vast numbers of people” who supported the Palestinian cause, and announced intentions to appeal to the Supreme Court and, if necessary, the European Court of Human Rights.
Protesters arrested for allegedly supporting Palestine Action have expressed anger at the decision. Deborah Hinton, 82, a former magistrate from Truro, Cornwall, described the judgment as “devastating and shocking”, while Marianne Sorrell, 81, from Wells, Somerset, said she was considering getting arrested again for the same offence. Father John McGowan, 75, said he was angry and disappointed but that the decision did not affect how he felt about his actions.
Defend Our Juries, a group leading a civil disobedience campaign against the proscription, has reported that 24 people in Scotland are facing charges for holding signs. Figures obtained by investigative outlet The Detail show 103 reports of terrorism charges associated with Palestine Action in Scotland, more than half of all 193 terrorism charges lodged there since the Terrorism Act was introduced in 2000.
The ruling is seen as a setback for those who hoped the ban might be quashed, but Ammori and others have vowed to continue their campaign both in the courts and through public protest.