Lead
The head of the world's largest fertiliser company has warned that the war in Iran could cost up to 10 billion meals a week globally and hit the poorest countries hardest, as fertiliser shortages reduce crop yields and risk triggering a bidding war for food.
Svein Tore Holsether, chief executive of Yara International, told the BBC that hostilities in the Gulf, which have blocked shipping through the Strait of Hormuz, are jeopardising global food production. He said that reduced crop yields as a result of lower fertiliser use could lead to a bidding war for food, urging European nations to consider carefully the impact on the "most vulnerable" in other countries.
Coverage Comparison
Two outlets — the BBC and The Guardian — covered Holsether's comments, with slightly different angles. The BBC framed the story around the global scale of the potential impact, emphasising that 10 billion meals a week are at risk and that the poorest countries would suffer most. The Guardian focused more on the consequences for Africa, describing them as "dramatic" and highlighting the risk of a "global auction" for fertiliser that could make it unaffordable for vulnerable nations.
Both sources quoted Holsether directly and included analysis from experts, but The Guardian also included comments from Chris Rogers, head of supply chain research at S&P Global Market Intelligence, who noted that food supply chains face direct and indirect challenges from fuel and fertiliser restrictions.
Key Claims
- 10 billion meals at risk: Holsether said that up to 500,000 tons of nitrogen fertiliser are not being produced because of the conflict, which he estimates could translate to 10 billion meals not being produced every week. This figure was reported by both the BBC and The Guardian.
- Crop yield reductions: Holsether stated that not applying nitrogen fertiliser could reduce crop yields for some crops by as much as 50% in the first season. Both outlets reported this claim.
- Poorest countries hit hardest: Both sources highlighted Holsether's warning that fertiliser shortages would hit the poorest countries hardest, with sub-Saharan Africa, Asia, and Latin America likely to see the most immediate impact. He noted that parts of the world with existing under-fertilisation could see "significant drops" in crop yields.
- Global auction risk: Holsether raised the alarm about a potential "global auction" on fertiliser, which could make it unaffordable for the most vulnerable countries. This claim was reported by both sources, though The Guardian placed greater emphasis on it.
- UK impact: The BBC reported that the UK is unlikely to face food shortages, but increased costs for food producers are expected to show up on weekly food bills in the coming months. This claim was not included in The Guardian's coverage.
- Africa's position: Holsether said that Africa is "actually quite well positioned to be a major food producer" but is currently a massive food importer. He warned that if a global auction on food occurs, "there will not be a famine in Europe, but we need to be aware of who we are taking the food away from." This was reported by The Guardian.
- EU response: The Guardian noted that the EU announced it was loosening state subsidy rules for industries and grant aid for individual farmers in response to the crisis. This was not mentioned in the BBC article.
- S&P Global analysis: Chris Rogers of S&P Global was quoted by The Guardian saying that food supply chains face both direct and indirect challenges from fuel and fertiliser restrictions. He highlighted that Africa's dependence on Middle East nitrogenous fertilisers varies, with Ethiopia and Kenya being heavily reliant.
Perspectives
- Fertiliser industry perspective: Svein Tore Holsether, as CEO of Yara, emphasises the urgency of the situation, warning that inaction could lead to severe consequences for global food security, particularly in developing countries. His comments serve as a call to action for world leaders.
- Analyst perspective: Chris Rogers of S&P Global provides a supply chain analysis, underscoring that the impacts are already deepening and affect both direct and indirect inputs, such as fuel and fertiliser.
- Potential criticism: While not covered in these sources, some may argue that the warnings from a fertiliser company CEO could be seen as self-interested, given that the company would benefit from increased attention on fertiliser markets. However, the sources present the claims as credible and urgent.