Tertius News is an AI-native newsroom: an AI model reads the linked source articles below and extracts what each outlet reported, so you can compare their coverage side by side. How this works →

Karnataka High Court Orders Inquiry into Surfing Selection Process Ahead of Asian Games

The Karnataka High Court has appointed former Supreme Court judge V. Raveendran to head a one-man commission to investigate alleged violations of selection norms by the Surfing Federation of India in choosing the men's surfing team for the 2026 Asian Games. The court, while allowing a petition by surfer Ramesh Budihal

By Tertius News AI Desk 2 distinct · 2 mastheads · 2 articles Version 1 Coverage Sep 1–2, 2026 Published 1h ago

Court Orders Inquiry into Surfing Selection Process

The Karnataka High Court has constituted a one-man commission headed by former Supreme Court judge V. Raveendran to conduct an inquiry into the alleged violation of selection norms by the Selection Committee of the Surfing Federation of India (SFI) for the men's surfing competition at the Asian Games to be held in Japan from September 19 to October 4, 2026.

Justice Suraj Govindaraj passed the order while partly allowing a petition filed by Ramesh Budihal from Kerala, a bronze medalist at the Asian Surfing Championship 2025, challenging the legality of the selection process dated June 23, 2026, in which he was selected as the first reserved athlete and fellow surfer Sivaraj Babu from Tamil Nadu was selected as the second confirmed athlete.

Court Declines to Disturb Final Selection

Considering the advanced stage of the Asian Games arrangements and the possible prejudice to India's participation if the present selection is disturbed, the court declined to quash the selection or recall the names already forwarded. Instead, the court ordered an independent fact-finding inquiry into how the special selection committee and the executive council proceeded with the selection.

The court stated that the inquiry is in the nature of a fact-finding and advisory exercise, and no finding recorded in the order shall be treated as a pre-determination of its outcome. The court also clarified that nothing in the order or in the inquiry shall be read as a finding on the comparative sporting merit of Budihal and Babu. The inquiry report may be submitted to the high court by February 1, 2027.

Background of the Dispute

The dispute arose after the initial selection, which was challenged by Budihal and the Surfing Federation of Kerala, was set aside by an Appeals Panel on June 16, 2026, directing the SFI to constitute a selection committee as per the selection norms and to consider performances of athletes from January 1, 2025 onwards.

Following this, the SFI set up a special selection committee, which unanimously selected Kishore Kumar as the first confirmed athlete and Srikanth as the second reserved athlete. However, the committee could not reach a unanimous decision on the placement of Budihal and Babu. It later recommended a surf-off between them, but one of the members of the committee found this procedure contrary to the norms and consequently resigned.

As the deadline for the selection of the surfing team approached, the Executive Council (EC) took an "executive call" to select Babu as the second confirmed athlete and Budihal as the first reserve athlete.

Court Finds Procedural Violations

The court found violation of selection norms in the fresh selection process undertaken by the SFI's special selection committee. It ruled that the intervention of the Executive Council was without authority under the norms, which only allow the EC to "ratify" provisional names approved by the selection committee.

The court identified 45 points in the SFI's selection norms for the commission to examine. The commission can recommend amendments to the selection norms to prevent future disputes, deadlock resolution, and federation bylaws, among other things.

The court expressed anguish that sportspersons, instead of focusing on competition, were forced into prolonged litigation due to lapses by the federation meant to serve them. It hoped that the task assigned to the commission would prevent recurrence of such issues.

How each outlet told it

A framing line is our reading of that outlet's own text — an interpretation, not a quotation and not a fact we assert. Check it against what the outlet published.

The New Indian Express

Framing: The headline emphasizes the court's order for a high-level probe into the selection of surfers for the Asian Games.

as of Sep 2, 2026, 2:47 AM UTC

Facts Included:

The Karnataka High Court constituted a one man commission headed by former judge of Supreme Court RV Raveendran to conduct inquiry into the alleged violation of selection norms by the Selection Committee of Surfing Federation of India (SFI) for men’s surfing competition in the ensuing Asian Games to be held in Japan from September 19 to October 4.
Justice Suraj Govindaraj passed the order while partly allowing the petition filed by Ramesh Budihal from Kerala, a Bronze medalist at the Asian Surfing Championship 2025, challenging the legality of the process of selection dated June 23, 2026 in which he was selected as first reserved athlete and other surfer Sivaraj Babu from TN was selected as the second confirmed athlete.
Considering the advanced stage of the Asian Games arrangements and the possible prejudice to India’s participation if the present selection is disturbed, the court declines to quash the selection or recall the names already forwarded.
Instead, the court said, an independent fact-finding inquiry shall be conducted into how the special selection committee and the executive council proceeded with the selection.
The court stated that the inquiry is in the nature of a fact-finding and advisory exercise and no finding recorded in this order shall be treated as a pre-determination of its outcome, and nothing in this order or in the inquiry shall be read as a finding on the comparative sporting merit of Budihaland Babu.
The inquiry report may be submitted by February 1, 2027, to the high court.

Read the source article →

The Hindu — World

Framing: Headline emphasizes the court's order for an inquiry by a former apex court judge into procedural lapses in athlete selection.

as of Sep 1, 2026, 2:19 PM UTC

Facts Included:

The High Court of Karnataka has ordered a high-level enquiry through a retired judge of the Supreme Court to find out reasons why Surfing Federation of India ( SFI) violated the prescribed norms in the process of selection of athletes for the men’s surfing competition events at the ensuing Asian Games to be held in Japan from September 19 to October 4, 2026.
The Court found violation of selection norms in the fresh selection process undertaken by the SFI’s special selection committee( SSC) after the Appeals Panel found fault in constitution of earlier selection committee, but did not disturb the final list of selected surfers for the Asian Games by ordering a fresh selection process.
The Court noted that altering the selection list at this last stage could prejudice India’s participation in the surfing competition.
Justice Suraj Govindaraj passed the order while partly allowing a petition filed by surfer Ramesh Budihal of Keralam, who challenged his exclusion from the main contingent.
Budihal, a Bronze medalist at the Asian Surfing Championship 2025, had questioned the legality of the process by which he was chosen only as a first reserved surfer while fellow surfer Sivaraj Babu of Tamil Nadu was chosen as the second confirmed athlete.
Raveendran, a former judge of the Supreme Court, was appointed as a one-man commission of enquiry to find out the reasons for deviation from the selection norms in placing the petitioner as a first reserved surfer and Mr. Babu as second confirmed athlete.
The Commission can recommend amendments to the selection norm to prevent future disputes, deadlock resolution, and federation bylaws, the Court said while identifying 45 points in the SFI’s selection norms for the commission to examine.
Neither the Court nor the commission would determine who is a better surfer but analyse only violation of norms, the Court made it clear.
The dispute arose after the initial selection, which was challenged by Mr. Budihal and Surfing Federation of Kerala, was set aside by an Appeals Panel on June 16, 2026 by directing the SFI to constitute selection committee as per the selection norms and to consider performances of athletes from January erse1, 2025 onwards.
Following this, the SFI set up SSC, which unanimously selected Kishore Kumar as the first confirmed athlete and Srikanth, as the second reserved athlete.
SSC could not take unanimous decision on placement of petitioner and Mr. Babu, and later it recommended conduct of a surf-off between them but one of the members of the SCC found this procedure was contrary to the norms and consequently resigned from the committee.
As deadline for selection of surfing team was approaching, the EC took an “executive call” to select Babu as second confirmed athlete and the petitioner as first reserve athlete.
Apart from finding fault in SSC’s decision making process, the Court ruled that intervention of the EC was without authority under the norms, which only allows the EC to “ratify” provisional names approved by the selection committee.
The Court expressed anguish that sportspersons, instead of focusing on competition, were forced into prolonged litigation due to lapses by the federation meant to serve them, and hoped that the task assigned to the commission would prevent recurrence.

Read the source article →

What was claimed, and who backed it

AI-extracted; can misattribute a claim — see Methodology.

Each row is one claim, attributed to the outlet whose wording states it most clearly. Confidence rates how directly the source text states the claim — explicit and unhedged rates high; hedged, pieced-together, or internally inconsistent statements rate lower. It does not measure whether the claim is true. Status is Contested when two claims on this page negate each other; otherwise it counts the distinct outlets we found asserting that specific claim — so a single-source claim can still show high confidence, and a multi-source claim can show medium. Every one of those outlets is named beside the status, so you can check the count against the list. For claims extracted before we began storing that list, the row says so: it names the outlet the claim is quoted from and states that we have not recorded which outlets backed it. Outlets wrote at different times, so a figure that evolves — a casualty count, for example — can legitimately differ between rows; check the "as of" time next to each claim's source.

Claim	Confidence	Status
ClaimThe Karnataka High Court constituted a one-man commission headed by former judge of the Supreme Court R.V. Raveendran to conduct an inquiry into the alleged violation of selection norms by the Selection Committee of Surfing Federation of India (SFI) for the men's surfing competition at the upcoming Asian Games to be held in Japan from September erse19 to October erse4, erse2026.	ConfidenceHigh	StatusMulti-source (2 outlets · 2 distinct) via The New Indian Express as of Sep 2, 2026, 2:47 AM UTC, The Hindu — World as of Sep 1, 2026, 2:19 PM UTC
ClaimJustice Suraj Govindaraj of the Karnataka High Court passed the order while partly allowing the petition filed by surfer Ramesh Budihal from Kerala, who challenged his selection as first reserved athlete and fellow surfer Sivaraj Babu of Tamil Nadu was selected as the second confirmed athlete.	ConfidenceHigh	StatusMulti-source (2 outlets · 2 distinct) via The New Indian Express as of Sep 2, 2026, 2:47 AM UTC, The Hindu — World as of Sep 1, 2026, 2:19 PM UTC
ClaimRamesh Budihal is a Bronze medalist at the Asian Surfing Championship 2025.	ConfidenceHigh	StatusMulti-source (2 outlets · 2 distinct) via The New Indian Express as of Sep 2, 2026, 2:47 AM UTC, The Hindu — World as of Sep 1, 2026, 2:19 PM UTC
ClaimThe court declined to quash the selection or recall the names already forwarded to the Asian Games due to the advanced stage of arrangements and the possible prejudice to India's participation if the present selection is disturbed.	ConfidenceHigh	StatusMulti-source (2 outlets · 2 distinct) via The New Indian Express as of Sep 2, 2026, 2:47 AM UTC, The Hindu — World as of Sep 1, 2026, 2:19 PM UTC
ClaimThe court ordered an independent fact-finding inquiry into how the special selection committee and the executive council proceeded with the selection.	ConfidenceHigh	StatusMulti-source (2 outlets · 2 distinct) via The New Indian Express as of Sep 2, 2026, 2:47 AM UTC, The Hindu — World as of Sep 1, 2026, 2:19 PM UTC
ClaimThe inquiry is in the nature of a fact-finding and advisory exercise, and no finding recorded in the order shall be treated as a pre-determination of its outcome, and nothing in the order or in the inquiry shall be read as a finding on the comparative sporting merit of Budihal and Babu.	ConfidenceHigh	StatusSingle-source via The New Indian Express as of Sep 2, 2026, 2:47 AM UTC
ClaimThe inquiry report may be submitted by February erse1, erse2027, to the high court.	ConfidenceHigh	StatusSingle-source via The New Indian Express as of Sep 2, 2026, 2:47 AM UTC
ClaimThe court found violation of selection norms in the fresh selection process undertaken by the SFI’s special selection committee (SSC) after the Appeals Panel found fault in the constitution of the earlier selection committee, but did not disturb the final list of selected surfers for the Asian Games.	ConfidenceHigh	StatusSingle-source via The Hindu — World as of Sep 1, 2026, 2:19 PM UTC
ClaimThe court noted that altering the selection list at this last stage could prejudice India’s participation in the surfing competition.	ConfidenceHigh	StatusSingle-source via The Hindu — World as of Sep 1, 2026, 2:19 PM UTC
ClaimThe court identified 45 points in the SFI’s selection norms for the commission to examine.	ConfidenceHigh	StatusSingle-source via The Hindu — World as of Sep 1, 2026, 2:19 PM UTC
ClaimThe initial selection, which was challenged by Budihal and Surfing Federation of Kerala, was set aside by an Appeals Panel on June erse16, erse2026 by directing the SFI to constitute a selection committee as per the selection norms and to consider performances of athletes from January erse1, erse2025 onwards.	ConfidenceHigh	StatusSingle-source via The Hindu — World as of Sep 1, 2026, 2:19 PM UTC
ClaimFollowing this, the SFI set up a special selection committee, which unanimously selected Kishore Kumar as the first confirmed athlete and Srikanth D as the second reserved athlete.	ConfidenceHigh	StatusSingle-source via The Hindu — World as of Sep 1, 2026, 2:19 PM UTC
ClaimThe special selection committee could not take a unanimous decision on the placement of Budihal and Babu, and later it recommended conduct of a surf-off between them but one of the members of the committee found this procedure was contrary to the norms and consequently resigned from the committee.	ConfidenceHigh	StatusSingle-source via The Hindu — World as of Sep 1, 2026, 2:19 PM UTC
ClaimAs the deadline for the selection of the surfing team was approaching, the Executive Council took an “executive call” to select Babu as the second confirmed athlete and Budihal as the first reserve athlete.	ConfidenceHigh	StatusSingle-source via The Hindu — World as of Sep 1, 2026, 2:19 PM UTC
ClaimThe court ruled that the intervention of the Executive Council was without authority under the norms, which only allow the EC to “ratify” provisional names approved by the selection committee.	ConfidenceHigh	StatusSingle-source via The Hindu — World as of Sep 1, 2026, 2:19 PM UTC
ClaimThe court expressed anguish that sportspersons, instead of focusing on competition, were forced into prolonged litigation due to lapses by the federation meant to serve them, and hoped that the task assigned to the commission would prevent recurrence.	ConfidenceHigh	StatusSingle-source via The Hindu — World as of Sep 1, 2026, 2:19 PM UTC

Transparency & Audit Trail

2 distinct · 2 mastheads · 2 articles consulted: The New Indian Express, The Hindu — World 16 claims extracted Version 1 Written 2026-09-02